talk is cheap...

...there is no shortage of opinions or advice on what "others should do", or
(worse) what "others should stop doing"  (as I read this all)...

Who will tell what is missing to make the showcase?

Who will make a functional comparison with (pick your favorite python wiki -
but keep to one using RST please, as we have a commitment to do the
community manual in sphinx)?

Who will then write the specs of what is missing (or just write examples)?

Since the wiki just quickly came together, and it's not being used for
_some_ reason, who wants to start listing what those reasons are, and
identifying the key blocks?



On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 2:59 PM, waTR <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> All you have to do is put together a wiki like web book. The wiki
> web2py currently set-up is close, just needs some small modifications.
> Once you have the wiki set-up for a book style knowledge repository,
> you can create a table of contents (PAGES list), and slowly fill-in
> those pages over time. It is not something that would happen over
> night, but something needs to be set-up to start this.
>
> Massimo, could you modify/add something like this to the wiki?
> Basically, it involves modifying the PAGES list view to include
> Headings, sub-headings, and titles. I would be happy to work on the
> table-of-contents to start...
>
> We definitely need an electronic community generated book in addition
> to the official manual. Not to replace mind you, but to elaborate on
> the topics covered in the manual and provide extended examples and
> recipes.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On May 2, 12:07 pm, Joe  Barnhart <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The wiki does not seem to have any momentum of its own.
> >
> > If we want to continue relying on three or four people (or one ;-) to
> > create all of the documentation for web2py, no action is needed.  If,
> > on the other hand, we want to harness more work from advanced and
> > occasional users of web2py, this needs to be addressed.
> >
> > Massimo -- I went back and looked at the wiki pages and found little
> > information that has been added in the last six weeks.
> >
> > Web2py has so much going for it, yet it is predominantly the effort of
> > a single, highly-productive individual.  We are not yet an open-source
> > community when we rely on the efforts of one person to write, debug,
> > enhance, support, and document the entire project.
> >
> > -- Joe B.
> >
> > On May 2, 10:28 am, dlypka <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hopefully enough developers will join the effort to keep up with the
> > > scatter.
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py Web Framework" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to