>> Anjo should change his surname to Anjo Frank. > > You should talk. At least I have one :P > > To be clear: one of the selling points of Roo as no lock-in. You can use any > number of JPA providers, you get code generated which you can customize > pretty well via aspect-j (a part of which I would like to see in EO generator > so one remove the weird _Foo classes) and you get this without any runtime > jars at all. Yeah I've wondered whether we should do class rewriting for _Foo and maybe even EO's period, like Hibernate does.
> So it's not D2W, but it's probably good enough to be workable. And given a > certain company's abysmal track record in supporting enterprise software, it > *might* be good enough for some to be actually considered as an viable > alternative for WO/EOF. I was pretty turned off by the demo video when I watched it a few weeks ago ... They LOOOVVVEEE xml files. It looked pretty tedious. That said, if you have to pick something other than WO, I guess you're going to have to sacrifice in some way :) ms _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
