Potential new adopters of WO at the beginning are likely to be more interested to know whether WO can fit their purpose than interested in contributing to Wonder. The more adopt WO, the more likely some of them will at some point contribute. So, whether Wonder is open or not is more of a concern to the existing members of the community who have already a solid experience of WO. But beginners will have to reach that level of expertise before they can think to contribute, and WO/Wonder documentation is not in the right shape to allow an easy uptake of the product. Plus, Apple attitude is a serious put off.
On 11 November 2010 21:03, Marc Guenther <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11.11.2010, at 15:19, Antonio Petri <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> IMHO, Wonder process lacks communication. Usually Wonder decisions (even >> dramatic ones) are made by one committer. There is no planning, no >> discussion. >> >> That looks pretty much Apple! ;) >> > > The coincidence. And they do not do releases either. > > Marc > > -- > Sent from my iPhone > >
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
