> The bottom line with me is that splitting > the community between two different sites > is not a good solution,
+1. I'm not very active in OS space, but the co-existence of genunix & OS.o has always confused me. - though there may be entirely legitimate reasons for having separate sites. ~mm > especially when the > two sites will most likely be using a different > wiki syntax. That just does not make any > sense to me, but maybe I'm the only one in > the community that thinks so. > > Paul > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Paul Kasper wrote: > >> I was aware of the restructuring document, but it >> doesn't say anything about genunix. I thought it >> was implied that we would be getting rid of >> genunix. > > If that was the intention, the document would have said it. The aim is > to enable sites like genunix, not replace them. > >> genunix, as far as I can tell, was required because >> the OpenSolaris site didn't provide wiki-based >> authoring. With the new OpenSolaris portal, this >> will no longer be a limitation. > > Sorry, that assumption is incorrect. I thought I'd made that clear. > _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
