Paul Kasper wrote:

> The bottom line with me is that splitting
> the community between two different sites
> is not a good solution, especially when the
> two sites will most likely be using a different
> wiki syntax. That just does not make any
> sense to me, but maybe I'm the only one in
> the community that thinks so.

We *may* provide a generic 'free-for-all' wiki in the future, but that 
isn't the purpose of the current project.

If there *was* a need to replace genunix, we would have to have a 
discussion with the owners and users of that site, they would have to 
agree that it was what they wanted, we'd have to set up an equivalent 
site and then and they'd have to help us migrate.  None of that has 
happened so far.

The intention is that the proposed new portal will provide a WYSIWYG 
editor, as per the requirements document.  The aim is that people won't 
have to use wiki syntax - unless they really wish to.

-- 
Alan Burlison
--
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to