Thank you I already tried that but didn't use capital letters for UV i use uv and weewx complain when I restarted it, now I will chck console and create formula to get right value.
Dne sreda, 11. april 2018 09.34.18 UTC+2 je oseba Andrew Milner napisala: > > I doubt if it can be done by a simple change as it appears to depend on > ozone thickness, cloud thickness, time of year and station elevation. > > However, if you know what it should read then provided it is a value sent > raw from the station, and is not derived within weewx, you can just say UV > = UV - 15 (if you want to just subtract 15 from the value supplied) or UV = > UV / 15 if you want to divide the value by 15 - going to your original post > maybe it should be UV = UV / 256 - which would probably give 0 at night (if > weewx is reporting 15) > > > Guess you should give some examples of UV on console and UV in weewx to be > able to derive a calibration formula > > > > On Wednesday, 11 April 2018 10:04:26 UTC+3, Damjan Hajsek wrote: > >> Anyone know what to use in >> [StdCalibrate] >> >> [[Corrections]] >> >> to correct UV index? Because now at night it is UV = 15 >> >> >> >> Dne sreda, 08. november 2017 09.56.35 UTC+1 je oseba Damjan Hajsek >> napisala: >>> >>> What is relation with UV index and radiation? >>> Because sometimes radiation is already 0 but UV index is still about 80 >>> or 50. >>> Doesn't that be also 0 when radiation is 0? >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
