So, if it is the RPi then it is either a sofward corruption on the card caused by the repeated rebooting after the fuse trips....or else some hardward failure on the board was the cause of the tripping. Its strange that since reassembling the Envoy, RPi etc there has not been a fuse trip.
One other thought occurs to me...I have a powered USB Hub attached to the RPi(its a 3B)....maybe I should disconnect the hub and try the Envoy directly into the RPi......if minicom works that would point to the Hub as being the culpit....!!?? On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 12:51:51 UTC+13 monmul wrote: > pi@WeatherPi:~ $ sudo /etc/init.d/weewx stop > [ ok ] Stopping weewx (via systemctl): weewx.service. > pi@WeatherPi:~ $ wee_device --clear-memory > Using configuration file /etc/weewx/weewx.conf > Using Vantage driver version 3.2.1 (weewx.drivers.vantage) > Proceeding will erase all archive records. > Are you sure you wish to proceed (y/n)? y > Erasing all archive records ... > Archive records erased. > pi@WeatherPi:~ $ sudo minicom -b 19200 -D /dev/ttyUSB0 > > > Welcome to minicom 2.7 > > OPTIONS: I18n > Compiled on Apr 22 2017, 09:14:19. > Port /dev/ttyUSB0, 12:49:30 > > Press CTRL-A Z for help on special keys > . > . > . > > > Again no return of TEST or NVER > > On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 12:46:43 UTC+13 monmul wrote: > >> So, having put the old Envoy back on the Rpi (having shown it worked on >> the PC) this is what I get....looks like some kind of continuous Loop >> situation. >> >> pi@WeatherPi:~ $ sudo /etc/init.d/weewx stop >> [ ok ] Stopping weewx (via systemctl): weewx.service. >> pi@WeatherPi:~ $ sudo minicom -b 19200 -D /dev/ttyUSB0 >> >> >> >> Welcome to minicom 2.7 >> >> OPTIONS: I18n >> Compiled on Apr 22 2017, 09:14:19. >> Port /dev/ttyUSB0, 12:42:51 >> >> Press CTRL-A Z for help on special keys >> >> LOO1 =vˆ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ b 2 >> v)LOO1 =vˆ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ b 2 >> ULOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> ¾LOO1 =vŠ 4H ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> ±LOO1 =vŠ 4H ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> «LOO1 =vŠ 4H ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> «LOO1 =vŠ 4H ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> ¾—LOO1 =vŠ 4H ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> ¾—LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> ³˜LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> ³˜LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> >> ]eLOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> >> Á LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> >> Á LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> >> Á LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> >> ³˜LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> >> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> >> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> >> /‚LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> >> >> ¤LOO1 =vŠ 4I ÀÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5‘? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> âYLOO1 =vŠ 4I ÁÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿPÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 5⊑? ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ½ b 2 >> ¾LOO1 =vŠ 4I Áÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ >> >> On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 12:40:56 UTC+13 monmul wrote: >> >>> But from the tests on my PC, it seems the old Envoy is working....does >>> it not.(so we do not have to worry about the new Envoy for now!)...so it >>> would appear as if the RPi is the culpit....have I deducted correctly? >>> >>> On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 02:29:03 UTC+13 tke...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>>> They did, but it was about 7 or 8 years ago. >>>> >>>> You really need to call Davis. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 7:22 PM Graham Eddy <graha...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> i do recall that davis introduced an incompatability between old >>>>> firmware and new datalogger but i don’t recall the details. i’m sure a >>>>> search of the forum archive would see if that was relevant >>>>> >>>>> On 11 Mar 2021, at 2:17 pm, monmul <dunb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yes I am using the original data logger and cable that came with the >>>>> old Envoy....I take out the data logger from he old one and put it in the >>>>> new one...I suspect that the data logger may not be compatible with the >>>>> new >>>>> Envoy >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "weewx-user" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to weewx-user+...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/A4FF1391-8844-4E16-8B1D-C2F6C6F06A3B%40gmail.com >>>>> >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/A4FF1391-8844-4E16-8B1D-C2F6C6F06A3B%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/dc1f0645-9a77-4e77-a082-c6f8ee2ed5dbn%40googlegroups.com.
