On 2009/3/17, Mark de Wever wrote: > Assuming we get into gsoc; the patches don't need to be applied directly > in fact I assume most patches need a few review + cleanup/fix cycles > before we can commit them. So I don't think Wednesday should be a hard > date if there are good reasons to delay it a few days, however I'd like > to have the announcement as planned on Sunday.
Agreed. I wouldn't trust a gsoc student to mess with the repository the very same day s/he is recruited. As a matter of fact and if I didn't misunderstand the IRC logs, some of the interested students haven't even played Wesnoth yet. So they really don't need an immediate svn access. > Would it be an idea to fork 1.6 about a day after tagging so commits > which are needed in both trunk and 1.6 can be applied to both without > merging? I'm not sure I understand. If the patches are needed for 1.6, then let's just wait one more day before tagging. No need to rush a crappy release, if you will have a fixed version by next Monday. Best regards, Guillaume _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
