Ivanovic, could you make a publicly accessible ical somewhere that we could all include in our agendas ? that would be handy
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Mark de Wever <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:48:35PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: >> David White <[email protected]>: >> > Personally I would love it if we could get our release cycle down to 6 >> > months instead of 12 (more like 14) months. >> > >> > I think that one of the problems with our current release cycle is that >> > people begin with thinking that 12 months is forever to develop >> > something, so they do nothing at all. It is somewhat demoralizing to >> > think of developing something and not see it in a stable version for 12 >> > months! >> > >> > Then time runs short, and people scramble: "If I don't get my feature in >> > NOW then it won't make it for 12 whole months!!" >> > >> > If we could reduce the release cycle to 6 months, these effects would be >> > lessened. >> > >> > I don't see why we can't be agile enough to have a 6 month release >> > cycle, and would love it if we could achieve this. >> >> I strongly agree with all of this. > > I more than willing to try the 6 month cycle another benefit to try it > now is that the work of the GSoC students will be released shortly after > they finished it. I'd suggest to start the feature freeze shortly after > the 17th of August (GSoC deadline) and then focus on the release. > > I really would like to make a decision about this, so I can start to > plan what I want to do before 1.8. (Half a year is not enough to > finished the GUI, but not confident a year would be either.) > > -- > Regards, > Mark de Wever aka Mordante/SkeletonCrew > > _______________________________________________ > Wesnoth-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev > _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
