On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Ignacio R. Morelle <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Friday 14 February 2014 14:25:08 David White wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Mark de Wever <[email protected]> wrote: > > > [...] > > > > I don't think we need a 'consensus' for something like this so much as > > somebody going ahead and writing something interesting! Maybe somebody > > should start by writing up about the recent Wesnoth meeting at FOSDEM and > > put it up to start the blog ... then something about GSoC and so forth. > > > > If some people want to take the time to write, then it can happen. If we > > don't have anyone wanting to do this it won't. I don't think anybody > should > > feel the need to ask 'permission' though or get a consensus before > > proceeding. > > That sounds nice and all, but we do need to decide on a *platform* (as > well as > appoint someone to maintain it) for this first if we want people to be > able to > read the post(s). > Again, if somebody feels passionately that there needs to be a platform then *they* need to go set it up get it working and everything. I think having a platform to do it would be great and I hope that somebody decides it's important enough for them to do. :)
_______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
