Ditto here too, WUG will remain at my company.  WUP doesn't carry over and
provide the same reporting abilities, is MUCH slower even on newer hardware.
WUG integrate wonderfully with Denika from somix or straight MRTG if you have
the time to configure it.

WUG is GOLD in my book.

~ Phil



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Ditto here. Very disappointed with WUP. We have decided not to migrate to
> WUP since WUG was much easier to implement and use. On a side note - since
> WUP so closely resembles HPOpenView our superiors have decided to go that
> way. Yes, I know it is more expensive but they made the decision and
> Ipswitch only helped them along by WUP. I mean if you got to learn a new
> tool then it might as well be the standard - right?!
>
> I will miss WUG and will continue to use it as long as I can.
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Jasa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 8:47 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake?
>
> I just wanted to add (maybe totally unrelated), that I've decided AGAINST
> moving to WUP because of the "fatness" of the application.  It seems WAY
> more clunky, hard to operate, and doesn't load as fast (most important) than
> WUG.    It's REALLY slow on my Win2000 system.   Very sad to see this from
> Ipswitch.   I'm sticking to WUG, it's lean and mean and works well, don't
> know why WUP was craeated to have more bells and whistles yet be more of a
> drag on the system and slower.   Bad upgrade, IMHO.
> pj
>
> ======================================
> Paul Jasa
> ======================================
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mitch Altman
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:00 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake?
>
> Actually you will see significant slowdowns with XP-SP2. This is not a
> problem with WUP. The slowdown is because of changes to the TCP stack made
> by Microsoft. I have attached a web page(from Microsoft) that vaguely
> describes one aspect of the problem.
>
> Basically WUP will work just fine on XP-SP2. It just runs significantly
> slower in some circumstances.
>
> Mitch
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Meyer
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 07:50 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake?
>
> Hi,
>
> After applying SP1, response time went way down. It became so bad, the
> product was unusable. I erased and reinstalled it without SP1, and things
> went back to normal. It is currently running on a pc with XP-SP2. Do you
> know of any compatability issues? We have a server on order. When it
> arrives, I'll try WUP on that.
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/14/2005 7:38 AM >>>
> Magnus, Maillist,
>
> > Is it just me or am I doing something wrong?
> I'm also experiencing lack of speed in WUP. Connecting trough MSTSC to my
> Windows hosts, WUP application is extremely slow. Network runs smooth,
> MSTSC also does. Simply WUP runs at snail pace. NmService.exe permanantly
> uses 50%+ CPU ressources on a dual 1.4GHz Sun LX50 with 1GB Ram Win2kSrv.
> MSDE Database on same host.
>
> >
> http://www.ipswitch.com/Products/WhatsUp/professional/WhatsUp_Professional_D
> atasheet.pdf
> > System Requirements
> > ? Windows 2003 Server, Windows XP (SP1 or later), or Windows 2000 (SP4
> or later recommended)
> > ? 260 MB of disk space
> > ? 256 MB RAM
> > ? To use beeper or pager notifications, a local modem and phone line
> > is
> required (WhatsUp Professional
> > does not support modem pooling)
> So, my host is adequate H/W, isn't it?
>
> Are there others experiencing this? I'd be pleased to get some feedback on
> this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Daniel
> --
> Daniel Blaser                        System Engineer ISP
> Abt. Lie-Comtel                      Tel: +423 / 236 17 60
> Liechtensteinische Kraftwerke        Fax: +423 / 236 17 41
> Im alten Riet 17, 9494 Schaan        Web: http://www.lkw.li
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE:  This e-mail is meant only for the use of the intended
>
> recipient.  It may contain confidential information which is legally
>
> privileged or otherwise protected by law.  If you received this e-mail
>
> in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, you
>
> are strictly prohibited from reviewing, using, disseminating,
>
> distributing or copying the e-mail.  PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE
>
> ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM.  Thank
>
> you for your cooperation.
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
> The information contained in this e-mail and any attached documents
> may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure.  If you
> are not the intended recipient you may not read, copy, distribute or
> use this information.  If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this
> message and then delete it from your system.
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to