Give it some time.  I am sticking with WUG for now, but I see some great things 
in WUP.  WUP can easily integrate with other systems with less programming or 
with less parsing since information can be taken directly from a "standard" 
database.  What would help the program is lower overhead.  I really think the 
programmers at WUP should look at "Rebol" to speed things up.

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Glatt, Robert (contractor) 
        Sent: Mon 3/14/2005 9:07 AM 
        To: '[email protected]' 
        Cc: 
        Subject: RE: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake?
        
        

        I use WUP on an XP machine. Using MSDE for the moment. Once I tweaked 
the
        program so that my SNMP log file wasn't huge and that gathering 
statistics
        was unchecked the program runs very well. I have over 4000 nodes that I
        monitor. If you are using MSDE the first thing to check is the size of 
the
        MDB file. If it is over 1.5 gig there might be some polling going on 
that
        you may be unaware of. I use both the console and web interface.
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Jasa
        Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:47 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RE: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake?
        
        
        I just wanted to add (maybe totally unrelated), that I've decided 
AGAINST
        moving to WUP because of the "fatness" of the application.  It seems WAY
        more clunky, hard to operate, and doesn't load as fast (most important) 
than
        WUG.    It's REALLY slow on my Win2000 system.   Very sad to see this 
from
        Ipswitch.   I'm sticking to WUG, it's lean and mean and works well, 
don't
        know why WUP was craeated to have more bells and whistles yet be more 
of a
        drag on the system and slower.   Bad upgrade, IMHO.
        pj
        
        ======================================
        Paul Jasa
        ======================================
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mitch Altman
        Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:00 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RE: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake?
        
        
        Actually you will see significant slowdowns with XP-SP2. This is not a
        problem with WUP. The slowdown is because of changes to the TCP stack 
made
        by Microsoft. I have attached a web page(from Microsoft) that vaguely
        describes one aspect of the problem.
        
        Basically WUP will work just fine on XP-SP2. It just runs significantly
        slower in some circumstances.
        
        Mitch
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Meyer
        Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 07:50 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake?
        
        Hi,
        
        After applying SP1, response time went way down. It became so bad, the
        product was unusable. I erased and reinstalled it without SP1, and 
things
        went back to normal. It is currently running on a pc with XP-SP2. Do you
        know of any compatability issues? We have a server on order. When it
        arrives, I'll try WUP on that.
        
        >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/14/2005 7:38 AM >>>
        Magnus, Maillist,
        
        > Is it just me or am I doing something wrong?
        I'm also experiencing lack of speed in WUP. Connecting trough MSTSC to 
my
        Windows hosts, WUP application is extremely slow. Network runs smooth,
        MSTSC also does. Simply WUP runs at snail pace. NmService.exe 
permanantly
        uses 50%+ CPU ressources on a dual 1.4GHz Sun LX50 with 1GB Ram 
Win2kSrv.
        MSDE Database on same host.
        
        >
        
http://www.ipswitch.com/Products/WhatsUp/professional/WhatsUp_Professional_D
        atasheet.pdf
        > System Requirements
        > ? Windows 2003 Server, Windows XP (SP1 or later), or Windows 2000 (SP4
        or later recommended)
        > ? 260 MB of disk space
        > ? 256 MB RAM
        > ? To use beeper or pager notifications, a local modem and phone line
        > is
        required (WhatsUp Professional
        > does not support modem pooling)
        So, my host is adequate H/W, isn't it?
        
        Are there others experiencing this? I'd be pleased to get some feedback 
on
        this.
        
        Regards,
        
        Daniel
        --
        Daniel Blaser                        System Engineer ISP
        Abt. Lie-Comtel                      Tel: +423 / 236 17 60
        Liechtensteinische Kraftwerke        Fax: +423 / 236 17 41
        Im alten Riet 17, 9494 Schaan        Web: http://www.lkw.li
        
        Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
        to be removed from this list.
        
        An Archive of this list is available at:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
        
        
        
        IMPORTANT NOTICE:  This e-mail is meant only for the use of the intended
        
        recipient.  It may contain confidential information which is legally
        
        privileged or otherwise protected by law.  If you received this e-mail
        
        in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, you
        
        are strictly prohibited from reviewing, using, disseminating,
        
        distributing or copying the e-mail.  PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE
        
        ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM.  Thank
        
        you for your cooperation.
        
        Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
        to be removed from this list.
        
        An Archive of this list is available at:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
        
        The information contained in this e-mail and any attached documents
        may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure.  If you
        are not the intended recipient you may not read, copy, distribute or
        use this information.  If you have received this communication in
        error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this
        message and then delete it from your system.
        
        Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
        to be removed from this list.
        
        An Archive of this list is available at:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
        
        Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
        to be removed from this list.
        
        An Archive of this list is available at:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
        

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to