Please disregard comments below.. intended for a different email. Regards, Ian
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Ian Cruzen " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:54:13 -0500 >I have off today and am attempting to put this through a major revision. I >hope to have something later this afternoon for ya'll to review. > >-Ian > > >---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- >From: Jean-Philippe SENCKEISEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [email protected] >Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:33:58 +0100 > >>I encounter also a strong performance problem with WUP & WUP SP1 due mainly >>to : >> >>Too many snmp valued collected in the log ( 40 000 ) >>Too many SNMP traps imported ( from previous well working WUG) >>Usage in // of Denika with mysql >>Strong usage of reporting through the console >> >>So i disable snmp trap collection , purge database and stop denika, its >>works better on the map and device view. However accessing reports still >>takes from 15 to 30 seconds which seems to be quite high and as life is >>short , i will appreciate not to loose any time due to a monitoring >>application. >> >> >>-----Message d'origine----- >>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Glatt, >>Robert (contractor) >>Envoye : lundi 14 mars 2005 16:07 >>A : '[email protected]' >>Objet : RE: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake? >> >> >>I use WUP on an XP machine. Using MSDE for the moment. Once I tweaked the >>program so that my SNMP log file wasn't huge and that gathering statistics >>was unchecked the program runs very well. I have over 4000 nodes that I >>monitor. If you are using MSDE the first thing to check is the size of the >>MDB file. If it is over 1.5 gig there might be some polling going on that >>you may be unaware of. I use both the console and web interface. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Jasa >>Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:47 AM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: RE: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake? >> >> >>I just wanted to add (maybe totally unrelated), that I've decided AGAINST >>moving to WUP because of the "fatness" of the application. It seems WAY >>more clunky, hard to operate, and doesn't load as fast (most important) than >>WUG. It's REALLY slow on my Win2000 system. Very sad to see this from >>Ipswitch. I'm sticking to WUG, it's lean and mean and works well, don't >>know why WUP was craeated to have more bells and whistles yet be more of a >>drag on the system and slower. Bad upgrade, IMHO. >>pj >> >>====================================== >>Paul Jasa >>====================================== >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mitch Altman >>Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:00 AM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: RE: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake? >> >> >>Actually you will see significant slowdowns with XP-SP2. This is not a >>problem with WUP. The slowdown is because of changes to the TCP stack made >>by Microsoft. I have attached a web page(from Microsoft) that vaguely >>describes one aspect of the problem. >> >>Basically WUP will work just fine on XP-SP2. It just runs significantly >>slower in some circumstances. >> >>Mitch >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Meyer >>Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 07:50 AM >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake? >> >>Hi, >> >>After applying SP1, response time went way down. It became so bad, the >>product was unusable. I erased and reinstalled it without SP1, and things >>went back to normal. It is currently running on a pc with XP-SP2. Do you >>know of any compatability issues? We have a server on order. When it >>arrives, I'll try WUP on that. >> >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/14/2005 7:38 AM >>> >>Magnus, Maillist, >> >>> Is it just me or am I doing something wrong? >>I'm also experiencing lack of speed in WUP. Connecting trough MSTSC to my >>Windows hosts, WUP application is extremely slow. Network runs smooth, >>MSTSC also does. Simply WUP runs at snail pace. NmService.exe permanantly >>uses 50%+ CPU ressources on a dual 1.4GHz Sun LX50 with 1GB Ram Win2kSrv. >>MSDE Database on same host. >> >>> >>http://www.ipswitch.com/Products/WhatsUp/professional/WhatsUp_Professional_D >>atasheet.pdf >>> System Requirements >>> ? Windows 2003 Server, Windows XP (SP1 or later), or Windows 2000 (SP4 >>or later recommended) >>> ? 260 MB of disk space >>> ? 256 MB RAM >>> ? To use beeper or pager notifications, a local modem and phone line >>> is >>required (WhatsUp Professional >>> does not support modem pooling) >>So, my host is adequate H/W, isn't it? >> >>Are there others experiencing this? I'd be pleased to get some feedback on >>this. >> >>Regards, >> >>Daniel >>-- >>Daniel Blaser System Engineer ISP >>Abt. Lie-Comtel Tel: +423 / 236 17 60 >>Liechtensteinische Kraftwerke Fax: +423 / 236 17 41 >>Im alten Riet 17, 9494 Schaan Web: http://www.lkw.li >> >>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >>to be removed from this list. >> >>An Archive of this list is available at: >>http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >> >> >> >>IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail is meant only for the use of the intended >> >>recipient. It may contain confidential information which is legally >> >>privileged or otherwise protected by law. If you received this e-mail >> >>in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, you >> >>are strictly prohibited from reviewing, using, disseminating, >> >>distributing or copying the e-mail. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE >> >>ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. Thank >> >>you for your cooperation. >> >>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >>to be removed from this list. >> >>An Archive of this list is available at: >>http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >> >>The information contained in this e-mail and any attached documents >>may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you >>are not the intended recipient you may not read, copy, distribute or >>use this information. If you have received this communication in >>error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this >>message and then delete it from your system. >> >>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >>to be removed from this list. >> >>An Archive of this list is available at: >>http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >> >>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >>to be removed from this list. >> >>An Archive of this list is available at: >>http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >> >> >>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >>to be removed from this list. >> >>An Archive of this list is available at: >>http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ >> > > > >______________ ______________ ______________ ______________ >Sent via the KillerWebMail system at ipswitch.com > > > > > >Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html >to be removed from this list. > >An Archive of this list is available at: >http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > ______________ ______________ ______________ ______________ Sent via the KillerWebMail system at ipswitch.com Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
