I have off today and am attempting to put this through a major revision.  I 
hope to have something later this afternoon for ya'll to review.

-Ian


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Jean-Philippe SENCKEISEN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Date:  Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:33:58 +0100

>I encounter also a strong performance problem with WUP & WUP SP1 due mainly
>to :
>
>Too many snmp valued collected in the log ( 40 000 )
>Too many SNMP traps imported ( from previous well working WUG)
>Usage in // of Denika with mysql
>Strong usage of reporting through the console
>
>So i disable snmp trap collection , purge database and stop denika, its
>works better on the map and device view. However accessing reports still
>takes from 15 to 30 seconds which seems to be quite high and as life is
>short , i will appreciate not to loose any time due to a monitoring
>application.
>
>
>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Glatt,
>Robert (contractor)
>Envoye : lundi 14 mars 2005 16:07
>A : '[email protected]'
>Objet : RE: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake?
>
>
>I use WUP on an XP machine. Using MSDE for the moment. Once I tweaked the
>program so that my SNMP log file wasn't huge and that gathering statistics
>was unchecked the program runs very well. I have over 4000 nodes that I
>monitor. If you are using MSDE the first thing to check is the size of the
>MDB file. If it is over 1.5 gig there might be some polling going on that
>you may be unaware of. I use both the console and web interface.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Jasa
>Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:47 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: RE: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake?
>
>
>I just wanted to add (maybe totally unrelated), that I've decided AGAINST
>moving to WUP because of the "fatness" of the application.  It seems WAY
>more clunky, hard to operate, and doesn't load as fast (most important) than
>WUG.    It's REALLY slow on my Win2000 system.   Very sad to see this from
>Ipswitch.   I'm sticking to WUG, it's lean and mean and works well, don't
>know why WUP was craeated to have more bells and whistles yet be more of a
>drag on the system and slower.   Bad upgrade, IMHO.
>pj
>
>======================================
>Paul Jasa 
>====================================== 
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mitch Altman
>Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:00 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: RE: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake?
>
>
>Actually you will see significant slowdowns with XP-SP2. This is not a
>problem with WUP. The slowdown is because of changes to the TCP stack made
>by Microsoft. I have attached a web page(from Microsoft) that vaguely
>describes one aspect of the problem.
>
>Basically WUP will work just fine on XP-SP2. It just runs significantly
>slower in some circumstances.
>
>Mitch
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Meyer
>Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 07:50 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: Antwort: [WhatsUp Forum] WUP.. Was it a misstake?
>
>Hi,
>
>After applying SP1, response time went way down. It became so bad, the
>product was unusable. I erased and reinstalled it without SP1, and things
>went back to normal. It is currently running on a pc with XP-SP2. Do you
>know of any compatability issues? We have a server on order. When it
>arrives, I'll try WUP on that.
>
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/14/2005 7:38 AM >>>
>Magnus, Maillist,
>
>> Is it just me or am I doing something wrong?
>I'm also experiencing lack of speed in WUP. Connecting trough MSTSC to my 
>Windows hosts, WUP application is extremely slow. Network runs smooth, 
>MSTSC also does. Simply WUP runs at snail pace. NmService.exe permanantly 
>uses 50%+ CPU ressources on a dual 1.4GHz Sun LX50 with 1GB Ram Win2kSrv. 
>MSDE Database on same host.
>
>> 
>http://www.ipswitch.com/Products/WhatsUp/professional/WhatsUp_Professional_D
>atasheet.pdf 
>> System Requirements
>> ? Windows 2003 Server, Windows XP (SP1 or later), or Windows 2000 (SP4
>or later recommended)
>> ? 260 MB of disk space
>> ? 256 MB RAM
>> ? To use beeper or pager notifications, a local modem and phone line 
>> is
>required (WhatsUp Professional
>> does not support modem pooling)
>So, my host is adequate H/W, isn't it?
>
>Are there others experiencing this? I'd be pleased to get some feedback on 
>this.
>
>Regards,
>
>Daniel
>-- 
>Daniel Blaser                        System Engineer ISP
>Abt. Lie-Comtel                      Tel: +423 / 236 17 60
>Liechtensteinische Kraftwerke        Fax: +423 / 236 17 41
>Im alten Riet 17, 9494 Schaan        Web: http://www.lkw.li 
>
>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
>to be removed from this list.
>
>An Archive of this list is available at:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
>
>
>IMPORTANT NOTICE:  This e-mail is meant only for the use of the intended
>
>recipient.  It may contain confidential information which is legally
>
>privileged or otherwise protected by law.  If you received this e-mail
>
>in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, you
>
>are strictly prohibited from reviewing, using, disseminating,
>
>distributing or copying the e-mail.  PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE
>
>ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM.  Thank
>
>you for your cooperation.
>
>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
>to be removed from this list.
>
>An Archive of this list is available at:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
>The information contained in this e-mail and any attached documents 
>may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure.  If you 
>are not the intended recipient you may not read, copy, distribute or 
>use this information.  If you have received this communication in 
>error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this 
>message and then delete it from your system.
>
>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
>to be removed from this list.
>
>An Archive of this list is available at:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
>to be removed from this list.
>
>An Archive of this list is available at:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
>
>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
>to be removed from this list.
>
>An Archive of this list is available at:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>
 

 
______________ ______________ ______________ ______________
Sent via the KillerWebMail system at ipswitch.com


 
                   

Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to