:-( That's just what lots of people say in java forums when a new Wicket release is announced : "We already have [replace with the framework you think is the market leader] , why the hell should we learn a new one ?" One of java's strength is in the choice we have to make our job done :-)
Korbinian Bachl a écrit : > hi, > > my thought is: with EJB3 and hibernate (and both together if you want) - why > do we need more ? > > regards, > > korbinian > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag >> von Geoff hendrey >> Gesendet: Samstag, 26. August 2006 18:54 >> An: Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net >> Betreff: [Wicket-user] library example using Shades for O/R mapping >> >> Hi All, >> >> I was one of the early users of Wicket before 1.0. I did a >> lot of work to use Wicket with my JDO implementation JDOMax >> (no longer supported). In the process I learned a lot about >> why it is harder than it has to be to use many ORM frameworks >> with Wicket and Tapestry. >> >> I'm a member of JSR 243 Java Data Objects Experts Group, and >> I advocated hard within that spec for the "fixing" of the JDO >> spec with regard to non-transaction-write behavior, along >> with Eric Samson and others. The JDO group was receptive, >> having gotten similar feedback from Howard Lewis Ship of >> Tapestry. I believe this change will benefit Wicket users, >> and make it much easier to use JDO 2.0 than JDO 1.1, from Wicket. >> >> However, I still wasn't satisfied that it was "easy" >> to do ORM from Wicket or Tapestry. So I started a new >> project, based on what I learned -- it's a better way to do >> ORM -- I call it Shades. Following the wicket style,Shades >> works without any XML configuration. >> >> Rather than make this any longer-winded, I thought I would >> just begin passing back some code, showing the Library sample >> application using Shades. The attached zipfile is just the >> "library" folder from the wicket sample applications. >> EditBook.java and LibrarySession.java have been altered to >> use Shades for database access. LibraryORMDictionary.java is >> the only new file required. >> >> Please let me know what you think. Also, I do not have a >> website for Shades yet but I hope to find the right venue for >> open sourcing the code soon. (see attached zip file >> 'library.zippo' with library-example directory) >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
