Hi Leigh,

Two things:

1. We are developing a Community Media node within WikiEducator -
www.wikieducator.org/Community_Media - I see that you are looking for video
help, but what about developing content for audio, that could be also be
repurposed, and broadcast as audio / radio content - is this of interest?

2. HIV / AIDS content - AMREF - we have some linkages with Africa, and I
understand that one of these organizations has made a contribution to
Otago's content development:

http://wikieducator.org/Lesson_10:_HIV/AIDS_And_Malaria

http://wikieducator.org/HIVAIDS

Here is the extra contribution to the Otago Unit developed by someone at
Mindset South Africa

http://wikieducator.org/Stigma_and_discrimination

- Your thoughts?

- Randy

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:00 AM, Leigh Blackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> 1. Otago's HIVAIDS <http://www.wikieducator.org/HIVAIDS> with...?
> Suggestions - webconferences, team teaching online, student and teacher
> exchanges
> 2. Otago's Tourism course 
> <http://www.wikieducator.org/Travel_and_Tourism>with...? Shared development, 
> shared resources, team teaching,
> webconferences, student and teacher exchanges
> 3. Otago's Blogging 
> handbook<http://www.wikieducator.org/Create_and_maintain_a_basic_weblog>...?
> Need short activity sheets on little things about blogging. Sheets include
> objective, activity steps, resources needed. Is to become a printable book
> with people able to pick and choose the right activity sheets for their
> needs and then print their customised book.
> 4. Otago's Horticulture <http://www.wikieducator.org/Horticulture>pages...? 
> Need more learning activities using resources made. Need more
> Horticulture units to be developed - such as landscaping and building units.
>
> 5. Webconferences <http://www.wikieducator.org/Webconferences> - probably
> the most easy to collaborate on.. simply organise a talk and add it to the
> list
>
> in my opinion :)
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Wayne Mackintosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey Randy
>>
>> That's an impressive reflection.
>>
>> It seems to me that there are strong consensus points and some VERY
>> concrete ideas to move forward.
>>
>> Shall we try to capture these ideas on this page:
>>
>> http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Community_building_strategy ?
>>
>> Clearly there are a number of content development "candidates" in WE
>> that are could become show case examples of collaboration in our
>> community.
>>
>> Clearly COL can help in connecting the right people together to
>> facilitate collaboration.  Open question to the community:
>>
>> In your view -- What projects would you list as the top five
>> "collaboration" candidates?
>>
>> Lets see if we can manufacture a little wiki magic.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Wayne
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 22, 3:43 am, "Randy Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Wayne, Leigh and others:
>> >
>> > Comments below, beginning in CAPS:
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:35 AM, Wayne Mackintosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >  Hi Leigh & Randy
>> >
>> > > I don't see the 3 capability phases  (that is; skills development;
>> > > personal content development projects;  and international
>> collaboration on
>> > > projects)  as being mutually exclusive. On the contrary they should
>> ideally
>> > > all happen in parallel <smile>.
>> >
>> > TOTALLY AGREED.  Rapid, parallel development is the way to go. Many
>> > iterations and experiences, incorporating feedback and local experience,
>> > creating our approach that feels more aligned to what we are creating...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > The challenge for our community is to figure out how best to manage
>> and
>> > > cater for multiple levels of capability without holding the early
>> innovators
>> > > back or alienating newbies. WE is a community which should welcome and
>> meet
>> > > all participants where they are at -- including the community leaders
>> who
>> > > are plotting our futures. Our focus on the building the future is a
>> core
>> > > value of the community, and is enshrined in our strategic thinking.
>> >
>> > AGREED.  As Otago is  on the leading edge for themselves, newbies also
>> > consider themselves on the leading edge for them too! :-) However,
>> Otago's
>> > leadership mitigates risk (in the future) for future action / adoption.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > Otago Poly has pushed the envelope. I can attest that Dunedin's
>> > > interventions have compressed the WE strategic time scale by 9 to 12
>> months
>> > > of where I reasonably expected the project to be at this juncture in
>> its
>> > > history.  So Leigh, as a community we will rely heavily on your
>> foresight
>> > > and guidance in helping us build capability for the next phase in our
>> > > evolution.
>> >
>> > THIS 9-12 MONTHS ' ACCELERATION  should be come a rallying point ....
>> how to
>> > capture and leverage this information...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > While our early attempts at international collaboration on specific
>> > > projects may not have delivered the dividends we would have liked  --
>> we
>> > > shouldn't be too hard on ourselves recognising that some seeds take
>> longer
>> > > to germinate than others. Let's learn from our experiences and figure
>> out
>> > > how to do this better .... So I'm reading and thinking about your
>> > > suggestions with CONSIDERABLE interest.
>> >
>> > YES, AGREED TOO.   I THINK THE WEBCONFERENCES should have a couple of
>> foci:
>> > (1) general topics of interest to the community;  and (2)  project
>> -based.
>> > Let's identify  several projects that we wish to foster the kind of
>> > collaboration that  Leigh is talking about, and we / WE can facilitate
>> > this....My sense is, this is largely a process / design issues....(
>> perhaps
>> > there's even another level in the Wiki Skills Certification process for
>> > WikiFacilitator/Collaboration - but first things first, let's get some
>> > active collaboration stuff happening... We will be able to measure this
>> > stuff - we've got to...thx. to our work with Jonathan Miller's (WikiEd,
>> M&E)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > Notwithstanding the phenomenal successes of the WMF projects -- WE are
>> very
>> > > much pioneers. WE is a unique community and is succeeding in engaging
>> real
>> > > educators in  the formal education sectors from all corners of the
>> globe. My
>> > > personal preference is that WE does not become a community which
>> alienates
>> > > newbies, but at the same time supports and feeds the innovators and
>> early
>> > > adopters.
>> >
>> > YES, WE are on the same page.....but  let's make a distinction between
>> > newbies exploring the development of wiki skills, and interest in
>> > collaboration. Positioned properly, any newbie can see the promise and
>> > potential of collaboration....that may be why they joined in the first
>> > place....Come to think of it, maybe we can adjust our Newbie survey and
>> > subsequent ones....to gain insights into their ideas and motivations
>> > underscoring collaborative intent and action. Let's harness and support
>> > Otago's increasing momentum.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > A tall order --- but based on our collective track record to date -- I
>> know
>> > > that we'll get this right.
>> >
>> > AND, there are many versions and nuances of "right", right?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > Hey -- is going to be a fascinating if not historic year for us!!!
>> >
>> > UBET!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > Cheers
>> > > Wayne
>> >
>> > > On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 09:51 +1200, Leigh Blackall wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Randy, Wayne.
>> >
>> > > I think Wayne sets out a realistic 3 steps. And for the most part I
>> think
>> > > we as a whole are taking those steps. A slight trouble (and risk) is
>> that
>> > > different people are at different stages in this flow. So while the
>> L4C is
>> > > focusing on Phase 1: Basic skills development in using the wiki a few
>> of the
>> > > early adopters are itching for Phase 3: Collaborative content
>> development in
>> > > achieving collective goals. Otago Polytechnic is an early adopter, and
>> we
>> > > itch for evidence of phase 3 because all too often we are having to
>> justify
>> > > our radically different approach to distance and online learning
>> (using
>> > > Wikieducator). I think we can handle this pressure, but it would be
>> great to
>> > > see some form of commitment (if resources permit it) to the
>> facilitation of
>> > > phase 3 opportunities.
>> >
>> > > Randy seems to be in a position to facilitate some phase 3. A team of
>> > > facilitators would be good. The webconferences might be a good way to
>> gather
>> > > steam around making phase 3 facilitation possible, but I suspect a
>> more
>> > > targeted and proactive facilitation effort is needed.
>> >
>> > > Otago looked like it had something going in terms of a collaboration
>> with
>> > > Mauritius over our Tourism developments. Similarly with 2 people in
>> the L4C
>> > > who contributed to "our" HIV/AIDS content. But disappointingly, these
>> have
>> > > not progressed. Mostly because Otago people have not had the time or
>> skills
>> > > to begin communicating around collaboration - and so an experienced
>> > > facilitator is needed. Someone who can mediate the initial stages of a
>> > > collaboration.
>> >
>> > > Randy's questions:
>> >
>> > > * Define what your understanding of Collaboration is?
>> > > * How do we propose to measure it, and over what intervals?
>> >
>> > > Collaboration is evidenced by:
>> >
>> > >    - Sustained communication
>> > >    - Negotiated outcomes
>> > >    - Shared actions
>> > >    - Shared ownership
>> > >    - Shared outcomes
>> >
>> > > This might be measured by:
>> >
>> > >    - The edit history of a page/s
>> > >    - The communication pages
>> > >    - The email list
>> > >    - Student exchange programs
>> > >    - Teacher exchange programs
>> > >    - Team teaching
>> > >    - Networked teaching and learning
>> >
>> > >  On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Mackintosh <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Randy,
>> >
>> > > I'm very excited to see our community starting to think about ways to
>> > > increase collaborative development.
>> >
>> > > As an aside - I think that this is positive sign attesting to the
>> > > dynamic nature of communities and how they mature over time. It's
>> > > tempting to distinguish capability maturity phases for WE, for
>> > > example:
>> >
>> > > Phase 1: Basic skills development in using the wiki
>> > > Phase 2:. Focus on content development for own use
>> > > Phase 3: Collaborative content development in achieving collective
>> > > goals
>> >
>> > > So it seems that WE has reached the next phase of our evolution
>> > > <smile>.  These are exciting times and its great to be part of the
>> > > early pioneers taking collective responsibility for building the
>> > > future success of OUR project. This is well aligned with our strategy
>> > > - because WE is now in the phase of scaling up content development.
>> >
>> > > See:  http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:About
>> >
>> > > Cheers
>> > > Wayne
>> >
>> > > --
>> > > --
>> > > Leigh Blackall
>> > > +64(0)21736539
>> > > skype - leigh_blackall
>> > > SL - Leroy Goalpost
>> > >http://learnonline.wordpress.com
>> >
>> > --
>> > ________________
>> > Randy Fisher - Facilitating Change and Designing Sustainable Ecosystems
>> to
>> > Improve Performance- for People, Teams, Communities, and
>> Organizationshttp://www.wikieducator.org/User:Randyfisher
>> >
>> > + 1 604.684.2275
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > Skype: wikirandy
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> --
> Leigh Blackall
> +64(0)21736539
> skype - leigh_blackall
> SL - Leroy Goalpost
> http://learnonline.wordpress.com
> >
>


-- 
________________
Randy Fisher - Facilitating Change and Designing Sustainable Ecosystems to
Improve Performance- for People, Teams, Communities, and Organizations
http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Randyfisher

+ 1 604.684.2275
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.hirerandy.com

Skype: wikirandy

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator, go to: http://www.wikieducator.org
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to