Hi all, I started a discussion over on the page as suggested by Peter. In summary: *I think we need some defensible standards that would satisfy the peer- review requirements of many institutions. *Because the WE projects are diverse and span many disciplines, I don't think a 'one-size-fits-all' review process will work. *A menu approach may work whereby projects would need to satisfy a certain minimum number of criteria out of a larger list of possible criteria. Thus content-driven projects could stand alone without hands-on demos; process-driven projects (and I'm thinking scientific method for example) might not need expansive bibliographies. *Solo projects should be welcome. Many of us strive along in our obsessive academic ways and end up with a product worth sharing. Collaboration while nice, need not be a measure of quality.
My 2 cents for the night; keep up the good work! Declan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiEducator" group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
