I'm really liking this discussion. I'd like to encourage others to throw in their thoughts. I believe having the WE community develop an approach to featured works and quality is a sign of our community maturity... If you have some thoughts on this topic please jump in to this google group thread or jump into the WE discussion; http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator_talk:Quality_Assurance_and_Review/Featured_project
Cheers, Peter On Feb 17, 4:52 am, valerie <[email protected]> wrote: > I like the "meets or exceeds at least n out of the list of x > assessment criteria" as the qualification for being featured. We > should be encouraging everyone to be "featured" rather than limiting > the selections - this should be an aspirational goal for all, not a > beauty content where there is only one winner. > > Authors can nominate their own work, and provide an explanation of how > they meet the specific criteria. They know their work and can see > beyond what would be discovered in the superficial examination. > > The criteria should include best practices. By definition that will be > an evolving dynamic set of criteria as we learn more about what works. > > IMHO ..v --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiEducator" group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
