Hi Mykola,

I would encourage WLX Jury Tool to follow suit and provide a similar option
to give easy openness to its users. There is no obligation to use either or
any tool. This overview is just a convenient way to make it easier for
organizers to be transparent.

Lodewijk



On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 9:49 AM Mykola Kozlenko <mycol...@ukr.net> wrote:

> Hi Lodewijk,
>
> As we intend to use WLX Jury Tool and not Montage in Ukraine, what is
> expected from us?
>
> We always publish the list of our jury members here:
> http://wlm.org.ua/juri/ , you can see all our jury members between 2012
> and 2019. The 2020 list is still being finalised as we are still waiting
> for final confirmations, but we will also publish it as we did in previous
> years.
>
> On the other side, as we have 47.5K images in Ukraine, we will have to
> organise multiple rounds, including checking the images before submitting
> them to the jury (as no jury is able to review that many images) and
> possibly a final call between jury members to distribute places among the
> top photos. We are happy to explain our selection process but we may not
> have the same details as for the teams using Montage.
>
> Best regards
> Mykola (NickK)
> WLM Ukraine team
>
> --- Оригінальне повідомлення ---
> Від кого: "effe iets anders" <effeietsand...@gmail.com>
> Дата: 1 жовтня 2020, 00:49:56
>
> Hi all,
>
> After getting feedback both on- and offlist, we arrived at the following:
> the Montage developers will make a page available to each jury coordinator,
> that they can copy and paste to a wiki page to share their process settings
> easily. That way it's easy to be transparent. At some point in the future,
> we will likely make this public by default.
>
> I do express the expectation that each national coordinator will publish
> their jury members (either real life name or username). It may well be that
> we ask you to submit this list of jurors when you submit your nominees
> (although we will not publish it on your behalf, that is your
> responsibility).
>
> Warmly,
> Lodewijk
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:01 PM effe iets anders <effeietsand...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> All great suggestions.
>
> In the past the WLM international team has also maintained a database of
> jurors to be backup. We had very little requests in recent years though,
> probably because so many people know organizers form other countries. If
> you're stuck, I would suggest to either ask someone you already know, or to
> ask this list. Most likely you have a response within 48h. But don't wait
> until the last minute, if you can avoid it. Jurors typically like a week to
> get things done (if the country isn't huge).
>
> Lodewijk
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 3:48 AM Rebecca O'Neill <rebeccanin...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Thank you Yaroslav, I will send you a separate email now!
>
> Having the WLE team setting up a pool of jurors like that was so helpful
> Anton. Yes, I could find the names and email other WLM organisers, but this
> system took that extra work away from me - which was hugely appreciated,
> especially in our first year!
>
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 11:45, Anton Protsiuk <
> anton.prots...@wikimedia.org.ua> wrote:
>
> The international WLE team this year has tried to create a database of
> jurors from different countries for local contests. We had a Google form
> for these purposes (https://forms.gle/Pj61adjgYiE6Jn687) & asked local
> teams whether they needed help with jury.
> We haven't estimated the results yet, since the local selection process is
> still ongoing, but it seems to have worked well.
>
> Best Regards
> Anton Protsiuk
> Project Manager at Wikimedia Ukraine
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:05 AM Yaroslav Blanter <ymb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If WLM Ireland is in September I can help as a juror. If it is in October
> this could be more difficult because I am also in the jury for Russia, and
> there is typically a lot of work there.
>
> Generally, asking around (may be also on Commons) typically helps. In the
> past I have been on jury for a few different countries. Somebody would just
> approach me and ask.If I can make it, I agree.
>
> Yaroslav
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 9:50 AM Mārtiņš Bruņenieks <marti...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi, Rebecca!
>
> I have organized multiple WLM/WLE editions in Latvia. We have used Montage
> in most of them.
> After experiencing problems with jurors dropping out or being known at the
> last moment, we created new Wikimedia accounts just for the jury and sent
> the passwords to them.
>
> Montage allows some editing of jurors after the round has started but
> results can be unexpected.
>
>  Mārtiņš
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 2:13 AM Rebecca O'Neill <rebeccanin...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Lodewijk,
>
> As a slight aside to this, and perhaps something that might help ease some
> of the worries around judging processes in other countries, would it be an
> idea to have a pool of international WLM Wikimedia jurors that could help
> judge other countries? Here in Ireland we have done this with Malta,
> exchanging jurors over the past few years, and for our first WLE this year
> we had Axel from Sweden be on our jury. You get the benefit of a fellow
> Wikimedian who understands the whole process, and who could bring some
> different expertise or perspective to a country's WLM. Having someone who
> is completely unfamiliar with your local built heritage means they can
> assess the images with a different take than someone who knows them very
> well.
>
> After 6 years, we have found it harder to recruit a jury from our pool of
> active Wikimedians and relevant expert judges from the arts and
> architecture sectors in Ireland. I know I would really appreciate it if we
> could "borrow" a juror from another Wikimedia group (in the past we have
> had some UK help with this too with jurors). We have suffered from jurors
> dropping out of the process at the last minute or after judging has begun
> (which results in having to restart rounds in Montage), generally it has
> been those who are not Wikimedians who perhaps did not fully understand the
> commitment when they agreed. Not only is it frustrating, it's very
> stressful. It may be less of an issue this year, given that the deadline
> for submitting to the international jury won't be at the end of October.
>
> Hope that helps clarify some of the issues some of the smaller countries
> can face over the years of WLM!
> Thanks,
> Rebecca
>
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 23:57, effe iets anders <effeietsand...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> As for the status of Montage requests: I suggest that you start a separate
> thread on that, and would like to leave this to the maintainers to respond
> to.
>
> As for publishing the settings: I was imagining some kind of log-style
> publication, not a near write-up. This won't be pretty, but it will allow
> people to figure out how it worked out in practice. If we follow a logical
> naming convention, people should be able to puzzle it together. Ideally,
> the national organizers also publish their process on the website, but this
> log would be a way to verify that. But I accept your note that we may need
> to add a context explaining that more process may happen before/after this
> tool is used.
>
> Lodewijk
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:17 PM Alexander Tsirlin <altsir...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Lodewijk,
>
> We also intend to publish by default the settings of the montage jury
> tool, and the number of photos in each round that the national competitions
> have used. We're debating whether there should be an opt-out for this year.
>
> This is unrealistic, because jury process may involve several campaigns
> that are later merged together (in Russia, we do it all the time in order
> to meet your submission deadline). Moreover, some of the photos can be
> accepted for the next round within Montage but excluded later on if we find
> that they do not depict cultural heritage. The end result is that any
> number you take from Montage will not match the number of photos that we
> publish (e.g., as a short-list). This will only lead to confusion and won't
> be of any use for anyone.
>
> Since you mentioned Montage, let me also ask when two important pull
> requests, which were done by one of our team members, are going to be
> merged into the code:
> https://github.com/hatnote/montage/pull/169
> https://github.com/hatnote/montage/pull/175
> These are really, really important fixes. Without them I would have a
> problem creating new Montage campaigns in October.
>
> Sincerely,
> Alexander
>
>
> On 9/2/2020 11:49 PM, effe iets anders wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> over the past years, we have had various requests to encourage national
> organizers to be transparent in their judging processes and who sits on
> their jury. Most of the national organizers are currently transparent about
> this already. In the past weeks/month, more conversation around this has
> continued with some concerns (valid or not) on certain jury processes.
>
> In this light, the international team intends to institute a new
> expectation for national organizers, namely to publish the members of their
> jury (be it their username or real life name) at some point. We have not
> figured out the practical details yet, but I can imagine that while we
> encourage publication on the website, we would ask national organizers to
> add a list of jury members to their submission to the international jury -
> which we then will publish as well.
>
> We also intend to publish by default the settings of the montage jury
> tool, and the number of photos in each round that the national competitions
> have used. We're debating whether there should be an opt-out for this year.
>
> We will of course apply at least the same level of transparency to the
> international jury.
>
> Before we make this decision, I would like to ask for feedback on this,
> and whether there are edge cases we should consider where such transparency
> would be harmful. I'll take 1 week to gather some feedback on this, and
> then we'll make a final decision. You can respond to this on this mailing
> list, or privately to me.
>
> Warmly,
> Lodewijk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing 
> listWikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonumentshttp://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
>
>
> --
> PhD in Digital Media
> Project Coordinator Wikimedia Community Ireland <http://wikimedia.ie>
> She/Her
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
>
>
> --
> PhD in Digital Media
> Project Coordinator Wikimedia Community Ireland <http://wikimedia.ie>
> She/Her
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing 
> listWikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonumentshttp://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org

Reply via email to