Yeah, I think we're waiting on responses from Alexey Baturin on those PRs. Is he on this list?
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 4:22 PM Alexander Tsirlin <altsir...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Lodewijk, > > As for the status of Montage requests: I suggest that you start a separate > thread on that, and would like to leave this to the maintainers to respond > to. > > I am asking because we fail to get any response at github since more than > a month, and I would like to reach also those members of the international > team who are not checking github regularly. Before we export something from > Montage, we should make sure that it does not fail upon import. > > - Alexander > > > > On 9/3/2020 12:56 AM, effe iets anders wrote: > > Hi Alexander, > > As for the status of Montage requests: I suggest that you start a separate > thread on that, and would like to leave this to the maintainers to respond > to. > > As for publishing the settings: I was imagining some kind of log-style > publication, not a near write-up. This won't be pretty, but it will allow > people to figure out how it worked out in practice. If we follow a logical > naming convention, people should be able to puzzle it together. Ideally, > the national organizers also publish their process on the website, but this > log would be a way to verify that. But I accept your note that we may need > to add a context explaining that more process may happen before/after this > tool is used. > > Lodewijk > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:17 PM Alexander Tsirlin <altsir...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Dear Lodewijk, >> >> We also intend to publish by default the settings of the montage jury >> tool, and the number of photos in each round that the national competitions >> have used. We're debating whether there should be an opt-out for this year. >> >> This is unrealistic, because jury process may involve several campaigns >> that are later merged together (in Russia, we do it all the time in order >> to meet your submission deadline). Moreover, some of the photos can be >> accepted for the next round within Montage but excluded later on if we find >> that they do not depict cultural heritage. The end result is that any >> number you take from Montage will not match the number of photos that we >> publish (e.g., as a short-list). This will only lead to confusion and won't >> be of any use for anyone. >> >> Since you mentioned Montage, let me also ask when two important pull >> requests, which were done by one of our team members, are going to be >> merged into the code: >> https://github.com/hatnote/montage/pull/169 >> https://github.com/hatnote/montage/pull/175 >> These are really, really important fixes. Without them I would have a >> problem creating new Montage campaigns in October. >> >> Sincerely, >> Alexander >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
