Hey again Alexander (and everyone),

Pleased to report that all the code that's fit to publish is now pushed to
the Montage production site: https://montage.toolforge.org/#/

This release includes admin performance improvements and the Archive
feature. We've also done a one-time cleanup and archived all campaigns with
close dates before 2020. For any others, click into a campaign page and
click "Archive Campaign" at the top. Unarchiving is included, free of
charge. :)

Thanks for your patience, and to all coordinators, keep up the good work!

Mahmoud & Stephen

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:30 AM Alexander Tsirlin <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Dear Mahmoud,
>
> Thank you for your prompt response. As far as I can see here:
> https://github.com/hatnote/montage/pull/169
> Alexey did everything he could do at this stage, and it is your turn now.
>
> best,
> Alexander
>
>
> On 9/3/2020 2:24 AM, Mahmoud Hashemi wrote:
>
> Yeah, I think we're waiting on responses from Alexey Baturin on those PRs.
> Is he on this list?
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 4:22 PM Alexander Tsirlin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Lodewijk,
>>
>> As for the status of Montage requests: I suggest that you start a
>> separate thread on that, and would like to leave this to the maintainers to
>> respond to.
>>
>> I am asking because we fail to get any response at github since more than
>> a month, and I would like to reach also those members of the international
>> team who are not checking github regularly. Before we export something from
>> Montage, we should make sure that it does not fail upon import.
>>
>> - Alexander
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/3/2020 12:56 AM, effe iets anders wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>> As for the status of Montage requests: I suggest that you start a
>> separate thread on that, and would like to leave this to the maintainers to
>> respond to.
>>
>> As for publishing the settings: I was imagining some kind of log-style
>> publication, not a near write-up. This won't be pretty, but it will allow
>> people to figure out how it worked out in practice. If we follow a logical
>> naming convention, people should be able to puzzle it together. Ideally,
>> the national organizers also publish their process on the website, but this
>> log would be a way to verify that. But I accept your note that we may need
>> to add a context explaining that more process may happen before/after this
>> tool is used.
>>
>> Lodewijk
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:17 PM Alexander Tsirlin <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Lodewijk,
>>>
>>> We also intend to publish by default the settings of the montage jury
>>> tool, and the number of photos in each round that the national competitions
>>> have used. We're debating whether there should be an opt-out for this year.
>>>
>>> This is unrealistic, because jury process may involve several campaigns
>>> that are later merged together (in Russia, we do it all the time in order
>>> to meet your submission deadline). Moreover, some of the photos can be
>>> accepted for the next round within Montage but excluded later on if we find
>>> that they do not depict cultural heritage. The end result is that any
>>> number you take from Montage will not match the number of photos that we
>>> publish (e.g., as a short-list). This will only lead to confusion and won't
>>> be of any use for anyone.
>>>
>>> Since you mentioned Montage, let me also ask when two important pull
>>> requests, which were done by one of our team members, are going to be
>>> merged into the code:
>>> https://github.com/hatnote/montage/pull/169
>>> https://github.com/hatnote/montage/pull/175
>>> These are really, really important fixes. Without them I would have a
>>> problem creating new Montage campaigns in October.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Alexander
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
>> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing 
> [email protected]https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonumentshttp://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org

Reply via email to