On 28 February 2014 01:23, geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 February 2014 22:03, Galileo Vidoni <gali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> And we remain convinced that there is space for a way more prudent >> implementation of URAA that prevents deleting educational resources until >> there is complete copyright information and no legal alternative, which to >> our understanding (and to our interpretation of WMF's communications) can >> mean waiting for DMCA takedown notices. > We could do that but it pretty much removes commons only advantage over say > imgur or flickr. We want the images on commons to be free. Not simply stuff > no one has got around to complaining about yet, This supports what I noted: Commons increasingly just can't be relied upon as a repository for the other Wikimedia projects. This implies no bad faith or bad actions on the part of the Commons community. (But that that's a distinct thing from the Wikimedia community is a lot of the problem.) Nor that what Commons *is* is inherently problematic; but what it is is less and less useful inside Wikimedia. - d. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
