I find it interesting to discover via this conversation that it has not been defined yet!
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Bence Damokos <bdamo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Nope. Gendergap is about the gap in female participation, not in > > female-related topics. > > > > I would say it is both, but in either case this would be important to > define if that is the criteria on which to solicit proposals. (The vision > of Wikimedia is to share the sum of all human knowledge, so from that > standpoint the end is to close the gap in coverage, diversity in the > editorship is a very important means to it.) > > In any case, experimentation with the grants programme is probably for the > benefit of the community, but so is reliability and predictability. If the > original assumptions are clear, announcing a major policy change for the > grants programme only with 3 weeks of planned lead time seems to go againts > those latter expectations unfortunately. > > Best regards, > Bence > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
