Let me rephrase that for you: Hey Jimmy, thanks for this commitment. I would definitely be interested. Were you successful in getting clarity?
If we all would spend a tiny bit more effort on how we ask things and argue, the last would be more pleasant and people would probably be more tempted to interact. Lodewijk Op dinsdag 22 maart 2016 heeft Fæ <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > It's now Tuesday, so presumably Jimmy Wales' commitment to publish > something by yesterday at the latest was met somewhere. > > Can anyone share a link to it? > > Thanks, > Fae > > On 16 March 2016 at 17:58, Jimmy Wales <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > I think all will be clear by Monday. Maybe sooner, but I'm not > > promising any sooner. > > > > On 3/10/16 12:13 AM, John Mark Vandenberg wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:51 AM, SarahSV <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:42 PM, John Mark Vandenberg <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Are we still waiting for Jimmy to agree/reject to James' request to > >>>> release an email? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Yes. Jimmy said on 28 February that he wanted to speak to others about > >>> whether it was okay to release his 30 December 2015 email to James. [1] > > -- > [email protected] <javascript:;> > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: [email protected] <javascript:;> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;> > ?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
