Risker, I agree that Wikimedians and WMF staff have, on occasion, been too
quick to add information about WMF employees to English Wikipedia. I
imagine that the same could be true for WMF Board, WMF Endowment Board, and
Wikimedia community members, although I'm not personally aware of that
happening. However, unless I am overlooking something, there is no such
thing as a dollar value criteria in determining notability. And I would
disagree that "We're really not that big or important of a charity." WMF
isn't the Ford Foundation but it is still notable and influential, with a
sizable budget and hundreds of employees.

Vito, I agree that original research does not belong in Wikipedia
namespace. However, investigative reporting, editorializing, and original
research are routinely done by the *Signpost*, WMF, and other Wikimedians
outside of article space.

Pine
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to