Risker, I agree that Wikimedians and WMF staff have, on occasion, been too quick to add information about WMF employees to English Wikipedia. I imagine that the same could be true for WMF Board, WMF Endowment Board, and Wikimedia community members, although I'm not personally aware of that happening. However, unless I am overlooking something, there is no such thing as a dollar value criteria in determining notability. And I would disagree that "We're really not that big or important of a charity." WMF isn't the Ford Foundation but it is still notable and influential, with a sizable budget and hundreds of employees.
Vito, I agree that original research does not belong in Wikipedia namespace. However, investigative reporting, editorializing, and original research are routinely done by the *Signpost*, WMF, and other Wikimedians outside of article space. Pine _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>