Add WMF-straff to a specific category, and make it possible to filter out users with a specific group within a category. Then forget the whole spreadsheet. Case closed.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Vi to <[email protected]> wrote: > AffCom has nothing to do with this kind of issue, most of projects have no > arbcoms, Finally, anyone would appeal, turning WMF-issued ban into a [how > to call this group?]-issued ban. > > Vito > > 2017-02-18 15:05 GMT+01:00 Olatunde Isaac <[email protected]>: > > > Gnangarra raised some valid and interesting points here. Well, I don't > > have problems with WMF banning anyone from Wikimedia projects as long as > > there is a significant reason to do so and through a transparent process. > > Nonetheless, I think WMF ban should be revocable following a successful > > appeal. They could set up a form of appeal committee comprises of WMF > Staff > > (maybe those from WMF legal team), AffCom member, and member of ARBCOM > from > > the project where the incident occur as suggested by Gnangarra above. > > > > Best, > > > > Isaac > > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless handheld from Glo Mobile. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Gnangarra <[email protected]> > > Sender: "Wikimedia-l" <[email protected]>Date: > Sat, > > 18 Feb 2017 21:20:16 > > To: Wikimedia Mailing List<[email protected]> > > Reply-To: Wikimedia Mailing List <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF advanced permissions for employees > > > > what this discussion reveals is that; > > > > 1. the people here want to know who at the WMF has what permissions, > and > > a when why they were granted > > 2. they want a system thats has good checks and balances, > > 3. there is want to be able to be "consulted' during the process of > > Global bans. > > > > > > - Number 1 is just a maintenance issue, an on Meta(maybe Foundation > > wiki) table of employee access would be the simplest to operate and > > solve > > rather than using a google spread sheet with a bot updating the on > Meta. > > - the process described by James Alexander appears to meet that, > though > > the duel role currently occurring isnt an ideal long term outlook > > - Create a High Court, or Supreme court type appeal process where the > > person affected can email the committee for a review. The committee > > could > > be comprise of WMF Legal person, Affiliate representatives(appropriate > > language speaker), and bureaucrats(ARBCOM member) from the project > where > > the person was active or the event took place. With an after action > > appeal > > it doesnt impinge on any potential urgency or immediate imperative. > It > > could even allow for the person affected to have someone advocate on > > their > > behalf. > > > > > > On 18 February 2017 at 19:59, Tim Landscheidt <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hoi, > > > > The problem with law enforcement is that it operaties nationally. It > is > > > not > > > > obvious where people are and consequently it is not obvious what > > > > jurisdiction is appropriate. > > > > > > > […] > > > > > > That's easy: The victim's. > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > > wiki/Wikimedia-l > > > New messages to: [email protected] > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > GN. > > President Wikimedia Australia > > WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra > > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > wiki/Wikimedia-l > > New messages to: [email protected] > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > wiki/Wikimedia-l > > New messages to: [email protected] > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
