Add WMF-straff to a specific category, and make it possible to filter out
users with a specific group within a category.
Then forget the whole spreadsheet. Case closed.

On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Vi to <vituzzu.w...@gmail.com> wrote:

> AffCom has nothing to do with this kind of issue, most of projects have no
> arbcoms, Finally, anyone would appeal, turning WMF-issued ban into a [how
> to call this group?]-issued ban.
>
> Vito
>
> 2017-02-18 15:05 GMT+01:00 Olatunde Isaac <reachout2is...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Gnangarra raised some valid and interesting points here. Well, I don't
> > have problems with WMF banning anyone from Wikimedia projects as long as
> > there is a significant reason to do so and through a transparent process.
> > Nonetheless, I think WMF ban should be revocable following a successful
> > appeal. They could set up a form of appeal committee comprises of WMF
> Staff
> > (maybe those from WMF legal team), AffCom member, and member of ARBCOM
> from
> > the project where the incident occur as suggested by Gnangarra above.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Isaac
> > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless handheld from Glo Mobile.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com>
> > Sender: "Wikimedia-l" <wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org>Date:
> Sat,
> > 18 Feb 2017 21:20:16
> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List<wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
> > Reply-To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] WMF advanced permissions for employees
> >
> > what this discussion reveals is that;
> >
> >    1. the people here want to know who at the WMF has what permissions,
> and
> >    a when why they were granted
> >    2. they want a system thats has good checks and balances,
> >    3. there is want to be able to be "consulted' during the process of
> >    Global bans.
> >
> >
> >    - Number 1 is just a maintenance issue, an on Meta(maybe Foundation
> >    wiki) table of employee access would be the simplest to operate and
> > solve
> >    rather than using a google spread sheet with a bot updating the on
> Meta.
> >    - the process described by James Alexander appears to meet that,
> though
> >    the duel role currently occurring isnt an ideal long term outlook
> >    - Create a High Court, or Supreme court type appeal process where the
> >    person affected can email the committee for a review.  The committee
> > could
> >    be comprise of WMF Legal person, Affiliate representatives(appropriate
> >    language speaker), and bureaucrats(ARBCOM member) from the project
> where
> >    the person was active or the event took place.  With an after action
> > appeal
> >    it doesnt impinge on any potential urgency or immediate imperative.
> It
> >    could even allow for the person affected to have someone advocate on
> > their
> >    behalf.
> >
> >
> > On 18 February 2017 at 19:59, Tim Landscheidt <t...@tim-landscheidt.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hoi,
> > > > The problem with law enforcement is that it operaties nationally. It
> is
> > > not
> > > > obvious where people are and consequently it is not obvious what
> > > > jurisdiction is appropriate.
> > >
> > > > […]
> > >
> > > That's easy: The victim's.
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > > wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > GN.
> > President Wikimedia Australia
> > WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra
> > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> > wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to