The backside seems to be that those who have been to the conference feel no incentive to participate in the strategy discussions in the projects, and these discussions show up as major disappointment (like those on the English Wikipedia or Wikidata) or do not really interest anybody (at the Russian Wikivoyage, we compiled a large document, which will likely be translated to English, moved to Meta and forgotten). Which technically means that this time, the individual contributors are excluded from building up the strategy, unless they can do it via chapters and thematic organizations.
Cheers Yaroslav On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Tanel Pern <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to add to this as someone who (also) was at the conference and > participated in a few of the strategy track sessions, it would have been > basically impossible to provide any more information than the conference > website already provides about what took place at this session beforehand, > given the extremely open-ended nature of the discussions. Just as outlined > in the session overview [1], the participants started from basically > nothing (other than their ideas of what's going to be important in the next > 15 years) and ended up formulating a few dozen thematic statements > regarding the strategic direction of the movement. Frankly, I'm amazed it > worked as well as it did. At the same time, I'm not at all amazed that it > would take time to digitize the materials, given how many people > participated in the session and how much paper they consumed :) And though > it wouldn't be difficult to publish the final thematic statements, some of > them unfortunately don't make sense without some background materials. > > Just my €0.02, > > Tanel > > > [1] > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_ > 2017/Program#Movement_Strategy > > 2017-04-06 16:42 GMT+03:00 Guillaume Paumier <[email protected]>: > > > Hello Hajdu, > > > > As Chris mentioned, there is a lot of documentation coming from the > > Wikimedia conference in Berlin. In fact, there is so much > > documentation that it's going to take the team a few days to digitize > > and publish everything. You can see some of the notes from related > > discussions, for example: > > > > * The notes from a discussion about movement strategy by contributors > > from Wikimedia Commons: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_ > > movement/2017/Sources/Commons_in-person_discussion_at_the_ > > Wikimedia_Conference > > > > * The notes from a discussion about movement strategy by the Wikimedia > > Foundation's Board of Trustees: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_ > movement/2017/Sources/ > > Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_of_Trustees_-_Discussion_at_the_ > > Wikimedia_Conference > > > > The rest of the notes, photos, summaries, etc. will be published this > > week or the next. There was nothing confidential about the sessions, > > and many participants have shared their work and sessions on Commons ( > > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikimedia_Conference_2017 > > ) and on social media ( > > https://twitter.com/search?q=wmcon%20strategy&src=typd ). > > > > I hope that this reassures you and gives you some materials to look > > over until we upload everything else. > > > > > > 2017-04-05 0:12 GMT-07:00 Hajdu Kálmán <[email protected]>: > > > > > > Hi, There is a very active campaign for strategic conversation defining > > the > > > future role of Wikimedia in the world. In the last weekend has been > hold > > the > > > Wikimedia Conference 2017 > > > in Berlin. On this conference was a spacial group organized from > > > Representatives > > > for the Movement Strategy Track. I paid great attention the conference > > > program, but unlike the former practice on the conference page on the > > meta > > > was not e bit information about what happened in this section. No > > Ethernet, > > > no abstract of presentation, nothing. > > > > > > I don't understand the new policy of organizers, that the conference > out > > of > > > the ordinary way was hold in totally confidential or secret wise. My > > > question this should bee the new Wikimedia strategy? > > > > > > Texaner > > > -- > > > Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > > > New messages to: [email protected] > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > > > > > > > > -- > > Guillaume Paumier > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > wiki/Wikimedia-l > > New messages to: [email protected] > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
