If the WMF is protecting us, who is protecting us from WMF when due process
is not followed, and false accusations and arbitrary punishments start
being issued by them?

To who /what can we appeal?

Paulo

A quarta, 12 de jun de 2019, 17:35, Robert Fernandez <[email protected]>
escreveu:

> Of course it doesn't belong to the WMF.  It belongs to everyone, and
> that includes the victims of harassment who have no one to turn to
> except the WMF.  I am not aware of the circumstances of this office
> action, but I am of a couple of the others, and there was nothing
> involving the star chamber hyperbole you describe.  Transparency is
> key to the project in terms of policy making and article creation, but
> the project cannot ethically demand transparency as you define it in
> private matters involving things like (for example) off wiki
> harassment and sexual abuse.  This process involves multiple layers of
> investigation and approval.  The only thing it lacks is the ability
> for you to pore over salacious details of someone's victimization.
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:07 PM Todd Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Robert,
> >
> > These two aren't mutually exclusive. Yes, Wikipedia belongs to everyone.
> Specifically, a place in the community of Wikipedia editors is open to
> anyone who would like to join. Those of us here have already done that. But
> it is natural in any community or organization to give more weight to
> respected, long-term members than those who just joined up yesterday.
> They've learned the ropes and demonstrated a commitment to it.
> >
> > However, the project categorically does not belong to the WMF. The WMF
> exists to serve and assist Wikimedia projects, not lord it over and rule
> them. And since "Wikipedia belongs to everyone", we certainly shouldn't be
> throwing people out in secret Star Chamber-style proceedings, where
> apparently even the accused is not permitted to know all the evidence
> against them. That is utterly antithetical to the open, community-run ethos
> of the project.
> >
> > Todd
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:09 AM Robert Fernandez <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I am not familiar with your name on enwiki, so I looked you up, and
> find that you have a grand total of 11 edits on all projects since 2015.
> >>
> >> This is part of the problem right here.  This isn't our project and we
> >> shouldn't be trying to exclude people from our community.  Wikipedia
> >> belongs to everyone.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:53 AM Peter Southwood
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Thrapostibongles,
> >> > I am not familiar with your name on enwiki, so I looked you up, and
> find that you have a grand total of 11 edits on all projects since 2015.
> >> > While it is possible that you have a long and distinguished edit
> history under a previous name or as an IP editor, it leads me to wonder
> just how familiar you are with the customs and culture of enwiki, which I
> freely agree are non-optimal, but have evolved to sort of work in an
> environment which was predicted to be impossible. Yet here we are,
> dysfunctionally surviving when we are theoretically long extinct. Our
> dysfunctional mores function as they do and evolve through surviving and
> occasional modification by consensus of those who care enough to take part
> in the process, within the environment in which we work. We are somewhere
> between an anarchy and a community, and we do not generally appreciate
> pontification from outsiders, which is what you appear to be, and to a
> large extent, what we consider WMF to be. It is a problem. If WMF chooses
> to rule by fiat it will have interesting consequences. So far they have
> mostly avoided that, and when they have it has not ended well. If you
> consider yourself an expert in something relevant I invite you to show
> evidence of your credentials. Otherwise we will take your comments as we do
> those of any other unproven internet commentator.
> >> > This is just my personal take, I do not presume to represent anyone
> else. You are as free to ignore me as I am to ignore you, but engaging in
> this discussion has its consequences, and one of them is to be questioned.
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Peter Southwood
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Mister Thrapostibongles
> >> > Sent: 12 June 2019 09:06
> >> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> >> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Fram en.wp office yearlock block
> >> >
> >> > Yaroslav,
> >> >
> >> > I think it's reasonably clear that the English Wikipedia community
> and its
> >> > community structures, such as its Arbitration Committee, and
> processes are
> >> > not capable of maintaining a productive, harassment-free environment
> for
> >> > the volunteer workers.  For example, they have consistently failed,
> after
> >> > several attempts, to handle the case of a volunteer who used the word
> >> > "Cxxx" about a fellow worker, and the community has agreed that
> telling
> >> > others to "Fxxx off" is acceptable.  These are symptoms of a
> dysfunctional
> >> > community, which tolerates behaviour that is unacceptable in any
> collegial
> >> > working environment, and it is right that the Foundation should step
> in.
> >> >
> >> > Thrapostibongles
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:56 PM Yaroslav Blanter <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > The point made by pretty much everyone is not that Fram should or
> should
> >> > > not be banned, but that the process in this case should have
> followed the
> >> > > standard dispute resolution avenues, More specifically, the case
> should
> >> > > have been communicated to the Arbitration Committee, whose members
> did sign
> >> > > the non-disclosure agreement.
> >> > >
> >> > > This is different from the past cases when users were banned by
> WMF, since
> >> > > in this case it was made clear the case is based on on-wiki open
> activity
> >> > > of Fram (and, specifically, only on the English Wikipedia). The
> on-wiki
> >> > > activity is subject to the community policies.
> >> > >
> >> > > To be clear, I am not a friend of Fram, and in the past supported
> desysop
> >> > > on a number of occasions.
> >> > >
> >> > > Cheers
> >> > > Yaroslav
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 5:46 PM Amir Sarabadani <
> [email protected]>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > People who oppose the ban: Are you aware of all aspects and
> things Fram
> >> > > has
> >> > > > done? Do you have the full picture? It's really saddening to see
> how fast
> >> > > > people jump to conclusion in page mentioned in the email. I
> personally,
> >> > > > don't know what happened so I neither can support or oppose the
> ban. As
> >> > > > simple as that.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > So what should be done IMO. If enwiki wants to know more, a
> community
> >> > > body
> >> > > > can ask for more information, if body satisfy two things:
> >> > > >  - They had signed NDA not to disclose the case
> >> > > >  - They are trusted by the community
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I think the only body can sorta work with this is stewards but
> not sure
> >> > > > (Does ArbCom NDA'ed?)
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 3:58 PM Paulo Santos Perneta <
> >> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Lack of transparency from the WMF, whatelse is new.
> >> > > > > I'm currently under a funding ban secretly decided (by who?)
> based on a
> >> > > > > false accusation, without providing any evidence. Until now I'm
> waiting
> >> > > > for
> >> > > > > an explanation from the WMF. So, this sort of attitude doesn't
> surprise
> >> > > > me
> >> > > > > at all.
> >> > > > > It is very unfortunate that the WMF apparently thrives in this
> kind of
> >> > > > > medieval obscurity, the opposite of the values of the Wikimedia
> >> > > Movement.
> >> > > > > Matter for Roles & Reponsibilities.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Best,
> >> > > > > Paulo
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Benjamin Ikuta <[email protected]> escreveu no dia terça,
> >> > > > 11/06/2019
> >> > > > > à(s) 05:45:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Thanks for this.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > I'm glad to see I'm not the only one dismayed by the
> unilateralism
> >> > > and
> >> > > > > > lack of transparency.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Jun 10, 2019, at 8:25 PM, Techman224 <
> [email protected]>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Forwarding to WIkimedia-l since WikiEN-l is relatively dead.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Since this message, an Arbcom member (SilkTork) stated that
> they
> >> > > > > weren't
> >> > > > > > consulted, nor did this action was the result of Arbcom
> forwarding a
> >> > > > > > concern to the office. [1]
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > The only non-response excuse from the WMF [2] was that
> "local
> >> > > > > > communities consistently struggle to uphold not just their own
> >> > > > autonomous
> >> > > > > > rules but the Terms of Use, too.” even though there were no
> >> > > complaints
> >> > > > > > on-wiki nor to Arbcom privately.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > The on-wiki discussion is taking place at the Bureaucrats
> and the
> >> > > > > Arbcom
> >> > > > > > noticeboards.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard#User:Fram_banned_for_1_year_by_WMF_office
> >> > > > > > <
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#User:Fram_banned_for_1_year_by_WMF_office
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#Request_for_ArbCom_to_comment_publicly_on_Fram's_ban
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > [1]
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=901300528
> >> > > > > > <
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=901300528
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > [2]
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard#Statement_from_the_WMF_Trust_&_Safety_Team
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Techman224
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> Begin forwarded message:
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> From: George Herbert <[email protected]>
> >> > > > > > >> Subject: [WikiEN-l] Fram en.wp office yearlock block
> >> > > > > > >> Date: June 10, 2019 at 8:54:34 PM CDT
> >> > > > > > >> To: English Wikipedia <[email protected]>
> >> > > > > > >> Reply-To: English Wikipedia <[email protected]>
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> In case you're not following on-wiki - Office S&T blocked
> English
> >> > > > > > Wikipedia
> >> > > > > > >> user / administrator Fram for a year and desysopped, for
> >> > > unspecified
> >> > > > > > >> reasons in the Office purview.  There was a brief
> statement here
> >> > > > from
> >> > > > > > >> Office regarding it which gave no details other than that
> normal
> >> > > > > policy
> >> > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > >> procedures for Office actions were followed, which under
> normal
> >> > > > > > >> circumstances preclude public comments.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bureaucrats%27_noticeboard#User:Fram_banned_for_1_year_by_WMF_office
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> Several people on Arbcom and board have commented they're
> making
> >> > > > > private
> >> > > > > > >> inquiries under normal reporting and communication
> channels, due
> >> > > to
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > >> oddity and essentially uniqueness of the action.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> There was an initial surge of dismay which has mellowed
> IMHO into
> >> > > > "Ok,
> >> > > > > > >> responsible people following up".
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> I understand the sensitivity of some of the topics under
> Office
> >> > > > > actions,
> >> > > > > > >> having done OTRS and other various had-to-stay-private
> stuff
> >> > > myself
> >> > > > at
> >> > > > > > >> times in the past.  A high profile investigation target is
> most
> >> > > > > unusual
> >> > > > > > but
> >> > > > > > >> not unheard of.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> I did send email to Fram earlier today asking if they had
> any
> >> > > public
> >> > > > > > >> comment, no reply as yet.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> --
> >> > > > > > >> -george william herbert
> >> > > > > > >> [email protected]
> >> > > > > > >> _______________________________________________
> >> > > > > > >> WikiEN-l mailing list
> >> > > > > > >> [email protected]
> >> > > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> >> > > > > > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >> > > > > > > New messages to: [email protected]
> >> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> >> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> > > > > > <mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >> > > > > > New messages to: [email protected]
> >> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> >> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> > > > > > <mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> >> > > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >> > > > > New messages to: [email protected]
> >> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> > > > > <mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Amir (he/him)
> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >> > > > New messages to: [email protected]
> >> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> > > > <mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> >> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >> > > New messages to: [email protected]
> >> > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> > > <mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >> > New messages to: [email protected]
> >> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> >> >
> >> > ---
> >> > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> >> > https://www.avg.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >> > New messages to: [email protected]
> >> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >> New messages to: [email protected]
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to