Hi all,

I'm torn on this issue.

I'm not a fan of Fram. Having been attacked by them in the past, I'm somewhat 
relieved to hear that they have been banned from enwp. I’m also dismayed by the 
poor response from the enwp community about this issue, particularly the 
inflammatory remarks and proposals that are intended to make the situation 
worse, rather than to work towards a solution.

Fundamentally, though, I think the WMF has missed something very important in 
the process that has taken place here: community representation. If an outside 
group makes a decision that impacts a community, without involving that 
community in the decision, then of course the community will be upset, even if 
the decision ultimately improves the community.

The WMF does a good job with involving the community in some of its processes - 
particularly in grantmaking, where elected community members are directly 
involved in the decision-making processes. In other cases, it uses ombudsmen 
quite effectively to investigate complaints, and to course-correct as 
necessary. In this case, though, the community has been deliberately excluded, 
and that’s not OK. And even worse, there is explicitly no appeals process, 
which is crazy.

The next step here really needs to involve the community. Enwp’s ArbCom would 
be the obvious community-elected group to involve here if at all possible,* but 
there are other groups available if needed (e.g., Bureaucrats, Stewards, 
Ombudsman commission). That doesn’t scale across all languages, or for all 
complaints, but it might work for this situation, providing that there is a 
commitment from the WMF to developing something better in the future (at least 
a community-elected ombudsman for this process!).

Thanks,
Mike

* Regardless of Fram’s opinions about ArbCom, which seem to have led to this 
block, it’s still enwp’s community-elected group that handles serious disputes.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to