Nice find, thanks for sharing! Amir: yes, we need global templates -- a framework for them and incremental way editors and tools can migrate to that. What's the latest overview of where that work sits? What can we all do to help?
🌍🌏🌎🌑 On Thu., Dec. 12, 2019, 8:37 a.m. John Erling Blad, <jeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Seems like Marius Hauken delivered the thesis in 2012.[1] > A short video is available on YouTube.[2] > He got several awards, at most three in one week. [3] > A few of them are listed here.[4][5] > > [1] Hauken, Marius Aa., and Kunst- Og Designhøgskolen I Bergen. Same > Shit, Different Wrapping (2012): Ca 200. Print. > [2] Wikipedia-concept for smartphones and tablets > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-xI-mPDLBo > [3] Tre designpriser på en uke > https://www.bt.no/nyheter/okonomi/i/eagk4/tre-designpriser-paa-en-uke > [4] REDESIGNING WIKIPEDIA FOR MOBILE & TABLET > > https://europeandesign.org/submissions/redesigning-wikipedia-for-mobile-tablet/ > [5] Masteroppgave, redesign av Wikipedia for touchenheter ”Same shit > different wrapping” > > https://www.grafill.no/visuelt/vinnere/2013/interaktiv-design/studentarbeid/masteroppgave-redesign-av-wikipedia-for-touchenheter-same-shit-different-wr > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:01 PM John Erling Blad <jeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I wrote 1996 in the subject field because that was the year I made a > > wikisite with tabbed interface, and experimented with a paper-like > > design in Xt. More or less what designers today would call a material > > design. The present design is what I would call Monobook 2.0, and that > > imply a 15 year old design. Monobook was rolled out in 2004-2005 if I > > remember correctly. > > > > At nowiki we had a discussion with a designer from The Oslo School of > > Architecture and Design around 2009, and he come up with a really nice > > design. The design at SNL (the other Norwegian lexicon) starts to look > > more and more like it. The design proposal was deemed to radical and > > to simple for Wikipedia. He got several awards for the design. > > > > No, I'm not a designer, but I do like good design. > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 1:34 PM John Erling Blad <jeb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Thank you, but discussing how your site or any other specific site > > > looked like in some year is an distraction. > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:30 PM Shlomi Fish <shlo...@shlomifish.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi John! > > > > > > > > On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 22:47:21 +0100 > > > > John Erling Blad <jeb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Could we please update them with a slightly more up-to-date skin? > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at our Norwegian competitor in the lexicon field. > > > > > https://snl.no/kunstig_intelligens > > > > > > > > > > > > > I took a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page and it > doesn't look > > > > anything like a geocities/etc. site from the 90s, and I feel it > doesn't look > > > > bad. > > > > > > > > For the record that was my site at around 1998 - > > > > https://old-1998-site.shlomifish.org/ and people complained enough > that my > > > > current site looks like "[insert year here]" that I added a FAQ > entry: > > > > > > > > https://www.shlomifish.org/meta/FAQ/site_looks_old.xhtml > > > > > > > > See https://everybootstrap.site/ for how many contemporary sites > look like. > > > > > > > > Someone on freenode told me he thinks plain black-on-white sites > look great. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Shlomi > > > > > > > > > John Erling Blad > > > > > /jeblad > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: > > > > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org > ?subject=unsubscribe> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Shlomi Fish https://www.shlomifish.org/ > > > > https://www.shlomifish.org/lecture/C-and-CPP/bad-elements/ > > > > > > > > As it turns out, compiling a C program from more than 20 years ago > is actually > > > > a lot easier than getting a Rails app from last year to work. > > > > — https://passy.svbtle.com/building-vim-from-1993-today > > > > > > > > Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - > http://shlom.in/reply . > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
