WM-AU doesn't have positions on internal things regarding en.wikipedia - we exist to promote free content. When I was asked, I avoided any mention of the foundation and simply expressed my views as an Australia-based administrator, and made clear to her that as there are 1500-2000 administrators worldwide, this is not a particularly exclusive standing.
cheers Andrew 2009/1/27 Brianna Laugher <[email protected]> > 2009/1/27 Gnangarra <[email protected]>: > > So what is WM-au position on flagged revisions? > > There is no WMAU position on flagged revisions (FR). Did you notice > one? I don't think anybody too much cares about WMAU's position on > anything just yet. :) It was more a "here is a local expert" angle > (and yes I am far from an expert, but compared to people who aren't > involved I might look like one, and I am undeniably local :)). > > AFAIK there is no WMF position on it either. It is a matter for the > community to decide. > > She asked about the vandalism, which prompted Jimmy's call, and I gave > some basic info about what the proposal involves and how it would > work, and mentioned that dewp and others have been running it for a > number of months. > > I also mentioned the argument that Jimmy has made, that you can > interpret it as a move towards greater openness because it would mean > less reliance on protection and semi-protection for BLPs. > > Brianna > > -- > They've just been waiting in a mountain for the right moment: > http://modernthings.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimediaau-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikimediaau-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
