> I for one think that requiring a specific filesystem structure or notice in > a git repo is quite far afield from the sorts of things that CoC is > designed to deal with.
I agree. I do think that as a community of practice we have many unwritten rules and numerous expectations of how we work together. We don't explicitly define the expectation of a README.MD file in repos either.[0] It's a best practice and cultural expectation in our spaces to include one. The code works the same with or with out it. Yeah, sure a coc.md isn’t “the same”, but both are expected as something we do as a community. If we need to write that down somewhere so there's no repeat confusion on if it's expected or not, that seems like a good compromise. However, I'd like to think we don't have to define everything, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ . [0] I'm waiting for someone to contradict me on this risky comparison. :) I could not find anything explicit in https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/New_repositories or https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Coding_conventions Yours, Chris K. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
