While what are we arguing then? I think i have lost track. -- brian
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > It's possible to highlight abuses while still being respectful and > collegial. No one is seriously arguing that criticism should be banned (or > the word "fuck"). > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 3:50 PM MZMcBride <z...@mzmcbride.com> wrote: > >> Ori Livneh wrote: >> >MZMcBride has a very good ear for grievances, and he knows how to use his >> >considerable social clout to draw attention to them, and then use words >> >as a kind of lightning-rod for stoking outrage and focusing it on >> >particular targets. >> >> I'm going to paraphrase what you're writing here: I spend some of my >> accumulated social capital calling out or highlighting abuses by and >> corruption within Wikimedia Foundation Inc. And you think that's _bad_? >> >> MZMcBride >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikitech-l mailing list >> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
