Andy Medina wrote:
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Pete Holsberg wrote:
And then I made the apparent mistake of telling you why this
came up in the first place.
It may be a good thing you made the "mistake". The argument
you are (or were?) presenting (no active directory and no
file/printer sharing) probably will not trump the "reclaim the
reserved 20%" argument she is presenting. Who can turn down a
"faster" internet connection, especially if someone makes the
argument that the "reserved" bandwidth is being paid for, but
not used.
??? I thought the consensus was that the so-called reserved
bandwidth was an urban legend.
--
Pete Holsberg
Columbus, NJ
"If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot
save the few who are rich."
-- John F. Kennedy
--
----------------------------------------
WIN-HOME Archives: http://PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM/archives/WIN-HOME.html
Contact the List Owner about anything: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Official Win-Home List Members Profiles Page
http://www.besteffort.com/winhome/Profiles.html
