Regarding the Nth (N == a large number) query to NeTraverse (this time
by Richard Fish) about when the 2.4.x version of W4L is going to be
out we get this from Mike Badger:
:: But to answer your question about 2.4, we don't have a set time line
:: at this time.
::
:: Thanks,
:: Mike Badger
:: NeTraverse
Forgive the vituperative tone of my note but this is a useless
non-answer. I (and I suspect many, many others who use W4L) are
growing more and more impatient with NetTraverse for giving this sort
of answer. It was fine when 4.0.0 came out. It was slightly annoying
when 4.0.1 came out. But, for goodness sake, its been months now.
I, for one, have not been able to use your (very useful) software
for weeks on my 2.4 machine (which I must run for my research).
The only reason I can think of why NeTtraverse is not saying is that
they have no intention of putting it out until a bone fide Linux
distribution like RH or Mdk does so. If this is the case then say
so. If I told my boss that I had "no time line" on my (very
open-ended) research he'd fire me.
I'm getting very close to "firing" W4L and going with VMware, even
though it is far more expensive and far less easy to use. And once
I do that, I won't be back.
So please, how about some _real_ answers here. What _is_
the problem? All we'd like is some useful, _truthful_ explanation.
You _must_ have a time line. You _must_ know where you are and how
much more there is to do! If you don't then may I suggest that your
software managers need to be replaced.
Dean S. Messing
Information Systems Technologies Dept.
Sharp Laboratories of America
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Win4Lin-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
