A good answer to this is that such information is rather excruciating to
wait for since Netraverse has only recently become better at list/customer
communication. People would rather ask, and have something they feel is a
more gratifying answer than just simply waiting and being told. Kind of
like when you go to a store and someone's on the phone. They're their to
serve you, ring you up or whatever, but when you get to the counter they
tell you to wait, even though you know they know what you want. Rather
off-putting I'd say.
--
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Sheryl Weidner wrote:
> Grant,
>
> At issue when I posted was not that you weren't entitled to your opinion
> or entitled to the right to wonder - but rather that you were asking Mike
> (who gets the brunt of people's wrath again and again around here) to
> *speculate* on something where, no matter what his answer, you or other
> readers will likely be unhappy with it and will take it out on him. Why
> not just wait for the company to post its upgrade policy and then take
> your complaint to the people who make the decisions? I know that Mike is
> a tireless advocate for customers and faithfully takes their opinions "up
> the ladder". I know this because I work at NeTraverse (system
> administration). I don't think we should take advantage of that by
> asking him to post his conjecture and then either disliking the conjecture
> or trying to use what he posts as opinion to get something different from
> what the company finally offers.
>
> -Sheryl, de-lurking for one day only.
>
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Grant Williamson wrote:
>
> > Mark&Sheryl,
> > why I ask, is quite simple, I like a lot of people who have backed
> > Trelos/Netraverse from day one, did not feel that Win4Lin 2.0 was a real 2.x
> > release. You of course are quite entitled to your own opinion.
> >
> > If there is once again going to be a heavy price increase in Win4Lin, I will
> > have to consider whether Win4Lin is still a wise investment.
> >
> > Like I mentioned earlier, Win4Lin 2.0 runs fine for me, I only need kernel
> > 2.4x support. Not a new product.
> >
> > Grant.
> >
> --
> Saska - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.noogie.com/~saska
>
> "He's an affable enough screen presence, but you'd be
> affable too if you could generate a lucrative movie
> career by copulating with baked goods."
> -Paul Tatara on Jason Biggs
>
> _______________________________________________
> Win4Lin-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
>
_______________________________________________
Win4Lin-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
