I think you may have missed the point. The Netraverse tech has said over and
over again that he has no idea what the pricing will be. Yet he is repeatly
getting slammed. He is a tech, not in marketing or obivously in the decision
making process as far as pricing goes.
Question of how the current software behaves, he can answer. Questions on
the upgrade price from ver 1 to 3, he can't.
He seems decent enough, somI am inclined to believe him, especially since I
know how tight lipped management can be.
Jose
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Gardner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Win4Lin-users] Upgrade pricing structure.
> At 10:05 AM 4/24/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >Larry let me inform you that you completely missed his point.
>
> I'm also sensing a tendency towards suppression of alternate views here.
> Just shut up and take what you're given when you're given it. Don't ask
> questions, especially the hard ones. Don't make waves; maintain an even
> strain. Of course I could be wrong, but that's what I'm getting lately. I
> think this might be an example of what some open source pundits predicted
> would be a problem with mixing open and closed source.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Win4Lin-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
_______________________________________________
Win4Lin-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
