Thanks Martin.  It's still alright for me to re-commit that last patch from 
yesterday, right?

-Nick





----- Original Message ----
From: "Snitkovsky, Martin" <[email protected]>
To: Davanum Srinivas <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Daniel 
Kulp <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 8:41:25 AM
Subject: RE: svn commit: r800517 - /incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/

Now, when all issues are cleared, seems like we are ready for a release. 

I will run the process first thing tomorrow morning (GMT+2) and post the call 
for the VOTE with all required information.

wish me luck :)

martin 


-----Original Message-----
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 4:28 PM
To: Snitkovsky, Martin
Cc: [email protected]; Daniel Kulp
Subject: Re: svn commit: r800517 - /incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/

Martin,

Please switch back to the tags. I was going by what we were doing in some older 
projects where cutting tags was done 
only once and that too after the VOTE was final. Looks like the incubator docs 
recommend the tag approach. So, sorry, my 
bad.

thanks
-- dims

On 08/04/2009 09:24 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
> Ok ... will also add this step to Wink Release wiki
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 4:19 PM
> To: Daniel Kulp
> Cc: [email protected]; Snitkovsky, Martin
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r800517 - /incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>
> Martin,
>
> Please specifically quote the revision # when you post the VOTE with the 
> release candidate artifacts.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On 08/04/2009 09:15 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> Please point to documentation on the incubator site where they say this
>> is allowed. "BS" is a strong sentiment. Let's please be civil.
>>
>> thanks,
>> dims
>>
>> On 08/04/2009 09:10 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>> On Tue August 4 2009 7:45:20 am Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>>> Martin,
>>>>
>>>> Please be *very* careful in terms of pushing out artifacts. Example
>>>> the RC
>>>> artifacts should never hit the public maven repos.
>>>
>>> If you use Nexus, this is automatic. Anything deployed there goes to a
>>> staging area. It won't make the public maven repos unless you manually
>>> promote it.
>>>
>>>> Also please don't create tags till the vote is complete. You can
>>>> create a
>>>> branch if you wish, but not a tag.
>>>
>>> This is BS. I NEVER vote a +1 on anything unless there is a tag there
>>> where
>>> I can confirm that the tag and what I'm voting on matches. The Maven
>>> plugin
>>> is based around that idea. It tags the source and then build all the
>>> artifacts from the tag so you are 100% certain that the released
>>> artifacts
>>> came from the tag.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> dims
>>>>
>>>> On 08/04/2009 12:40 AM, Snitkovsky, Martin wrote:
>>>>> Dims,
>>>>> I did not cut a final tag - was just testing maven-release-plugin
>>>>> for our
>>>>> release process.
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 12:44 AM
>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r800517 -
>>>>> /incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry. you cannot cut a tag till the formal VOTE is complete.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- dims
>>>>>
>>>>> On 08/03/2009 03:49 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>> Author: martins
>>>>>> Date: Mon Aug 3 19:49:20 2009
>>>>>> New Revision: 800517
>>>>>>
>>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=800517&view=rev 
>>>>>> Log: (empty)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Removed:
>>>>>> incubator/wink/tags/wink-0.1-incubating/
>>>



      

Reply via email to