[Winona Online Democracy]
Tom, and everybody:
ALL of us need regular office visits with our physicians. Hopefully, these
will just be well-care visits, but regular check ups are an extremely
important part of catching and treating any health problems while they are
still small and very treatable--or preventable.
I believe in universal health care coverage, but to tell the absolute truth,
I haven't seen a plan that I really like. In Europe, health care is
universal and free, but also rationed--not what I want for myself or my
loved ones. Based on my dealings with Medicare on behalf of my mother, I
certainly do NOT want this model for any of us, including our seniors. And
I understand employers' frustration about the difficulty and expense in
providing good health care benefits to employees. However, I know more than
a few people who are in their present positions precisely because they need
and want the health care benefits provided by their employers. And should
employers pull out of health care altogether, leaving health care coverage
to individuals, the following would happen (based, actually, on what really
happens now):
1. Insurance companies would have even greater power since there would no
longer be blocks of employers/employees (and customers) acting together to
get the best deal possible. We'd all be on our own. It's not like the
insurance industry is well regulated now.
2. People who felt they could go without health insurance or who only
wanted/could afford to pay for catestrophic coverage would then do what the
uninsured/underinsured do now: go without, run up medical bills and either
ruin their credit ratings trying to pay for them or simply not pay, meaning
that the medical provider would eat the cost to a certain extent, but that
the rest of us would get to help pay for those bills (including collection
costs and lawyer/court fees) in the form of higher medical costs. We'd all
lose.
3. OR People would simply avoid going to the doctor except for the very
most serious illnesses, which would be harder to treat, requiring a more
extensive (and expensive) course of treatment. Not only would the patient
lose, but so would we all with the loss of productivity of our workforce as
workers are forced to stay home longer to recuperate or care for sick loved
ones AND/OR see No. 2. And of course, in general, well care (immunizations,
important screenings for cancer, diabetes, high blood pressure, heart
conditions, etc.) would become more expensive as economies of scale would
be lost as fewer people
I really wish I had good solutions, instead of pointing out flaws.
Terri Hyle
_________________________________________________________________
Click here for a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee.
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org
- Re: [Winona] Is it time for the discussion? Polyga... Duane Peterson
- RE: [Winona] Is it time for the discussion? Polygamy terri hyle
- FW: [Winona] Is it time for the discussion? Polygamy Paul Double
- Re: [Winona] Is it time for the discussion? Polyga... Bob Sebo
- RE: [Winona] Is it time for the discussion? Po... Richard Pflughoeft
- RE: [Winona] Is it time for the discussion... Tom Severson
- RE: [Winona] Polygamy,Healthcare Benefits, &am... Clayton Templeton
- Re: [Winona] Polygamy,Healthcare Benefits,... Ruth Charles
- Re: [Winona] Is it time for the discussion? Polyga... Duane Peterson
- RE: [Winona] Is it time for the discussion? Polygamy terri hyle
- RE: [Winona] Is it time for the discussion? Polygamy Richard Pflughoeft
- Fw: [Winona] Is it time for the discussion? Polygamy Kathy Seifert
- Re: Fw: [Winona] Is it time for the discussion? Po... Vicki Englich
- RE: Fw: [Winona] Is it time for the discussion... Phil Carlson
- Re: Fw: [Winona] Is it time for the discus... Kathy Seifert
