But it sounds like that would require MT as end-user CPE? Wouldn't work
for us...
-Jon
Paul Hendry wrote:
That's one of the reasons that the WDS, EoIP combo works so well as the end
user keeps that same address and it cuts out the repeated DHCP stage at AP
hand over.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jon Langeler
Sent: 07 September 2006 08:57
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bragging on Mikrotik
It's too bad MT doesn't come up with a mobile roaming / routing
protocol(unless they do and I don't know of it). Where the end user
retains the same IP address even after it get routed between various
towers and is wireless medium independent(wifi, wimax, cdma). Does
anyone here have experience/ideas with that?
Jon Langeler
Michwave Tech.
Butch Evans wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
How long is a ping? Isn't windows ping like 4 sec? 7 times 4 = 28
seconds. To me, (if my math is correct) 28 sec is frustrating, not
seamless.
Perhaps "seamless" is not the proper word. We did some testing today
and a cop used his laptop at 6 locations throughout the city to surf
the web and do license checks. From his perspective, it was
seamless. From the perspective of the network...there were seams. Is
that a more clear explanation?
--
Jon Langeler
Michwave Tech.
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
