But it sounds like that would require MT as end-user CPE? Wouldn't work for us...


Paul Hendry wrote:

That's one of the reasons that the WDS, EoIP combo works so well as the end
user keeps that same address and it cuts out the repeated DHCP stage at AP
hand over.

-----Original Message-----
Behalf Of Jon Langeler
Sent: 07 September 2006 08:57
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bragging on Mikrotik

It's too bad MT doesn't come up with a mobile roaming / routing protocol(unless they do and I don't know of it). Where the end user retains the same IP address even after it get routed between various towers and is wireless medium independent(wifi, wimax, cdma). Does anyone here have experience/ideas with that?

Jon Langeler
Michwave Tech.

Butch Evans wrote:

On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Brian Rohrbacher wrote:

How long is a ping? Isn't windows ping like 4 sec? 7 times 4 = 28 seconds. To me, (if my math is correct) 28 sec is frustrating, not seamless.
Perhaps "seamless" is not the proper word. We did some testing today and a cop used his laptop at 6 locations throughout the city to surf the web and do license checks. From his perspective, it was seamless. From the perspective of the network...there were seams. Is that a more clear explanation?

Jon Langeler
Michwave Tech.

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org


Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to