Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
Several of us on this list know how to shut down these large channel backhauls, and have done so when they have intentionally interfered with our operations. Be ready for someone to do the same to you if you try using a full-band backhaul. More than one operator who thought they would take over the entire band got a rude surprise when the gear suddenly didn't work anymore. 24ghz is a completely different story, as the beam sizes are very small and lots of colocation can take place. I think you are on the right track with the 24ghz solution.

So you believe someone was intentionally interfering with your operations and your response was to do the same? I'm not sure what that has do with running this gear when one's intent is backhaul; not interference. When we sign a lease for a wireless colocation site we specify what frequencies we are using and agree not to interfere with an existing tenants. All future tenants must follow the same rules or risk being evicted. Tortuous interference is simply illegal and has civil penalties associated with it.

-Matt

--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to