Don't you protect your NOC Muddy? My NOC is already locked and I pay $30 a
month for alarm service. I have been doing that for 6 years already. I also
have a camera system which monitors the front door and stores all the video
of entry and exit to my NOC. I did this prior to CALEA because I want that
level of security myself. It is just common sense to do these things as far
as I am concerned. The rest of what you are saying sounds like FUD to me.
Scriv

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:44 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> This is where I am sadly going to post to you sometime in the near
> future...
>
> I told you so.
>
> And that will be the saddest day for all of us.
>
> I have no "unfounded fears".   I just read and understand precisely what
> these things mean.   It won't be the first one, it won't be the second one.
> It may not even be the first time someone's data doesn't work out for LEA
> that things go sour.   But it WILL happen.   YOU will find yourself
> explaining your mechanism for security, confidentiality, and so on.   And
> those are the aspects that will kill us.
>
> No matter what the folks who liason with you at the FCC or FBI, they don't
> speak for the irritated prosecutors or agents who will not have had ny
> quality control over the data themselves, and so will dump on YOU.    And
> they do intend for you to do this JUST LIKE THE PHONE COMPANY.   That means
> the locked buildings, the hard lines, the secure data storage, and on and
> on.    I'm not kidding.   There's a reason the reports insist on you
> explaining your plan for each of these things, including the chain of
> custody for the data and your security plan.  They expect a specific set of
> circumstances, and to them, that's what CALEA means to them.
>
> How many times have we seen a big flap in the news because some low level
> flunkie took a laptop home, or whatever?    Those are only the things that
> make the news.
>
> How long will you be collecting data?   Are you going to have someone to
> physically be there?   If not, and if the location isn't secure, alarmed,
> and locked, POOF.   You're toast.   And so's the case for the LEA.
>
> Your data has obvious gaps in the packets...   Do you think that "there's
> packet loss between the access point and my collection point" going to
> mollify someone wanting to make an example of you?    Nope.   First rule of
> law... if you can't prosecute the criminal, get the guy watching him...".
> YOU will be the target and they'll come guns blazing.   It would be better
> for you to say you can't do it, than to do it and then let them down.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> <insert witty tagline here>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Butch Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 12:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Topic change - Trade Association
> Was:Report:FCCtoPunishComcast Over Web Blocking
>
>
> > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>Forrest, let me get back to the very old conversation about why
> >>WISPA should organized at least 1500 filings to the FCC by every
> >>WISP they could get to act, to say "This cannot be done".
> >
> > Your fears are unfounded and not based in reality.  I understand,
> > now, why you think it will cost so much.  You are simply incorrect
> > in nearly all of your assumptions.  Have you even read the standard?
> > The Law?  Nowhere in either will you find ANY of what you are
> > talking about.
> >
> >>3.  Once your data is collected, it must be remain secure.  You
> >>must have a safe or a vault in which to keep it, expressly and
> >>solely for the purpose of
> >
> > This is ludicrous.  Your whole post, I mean, not just this one
> > point, though this one is the most laughable.
> >
> >
> > --
> > ********************************************************************
> > *Butch Evans *Professional Network Consultation *
> > *Network Engineering *MikroTik RouterOS    *
> > *573-276-2879 *ImageStream                       *
> > *http://www.butchevans.com/ *StarOS and MORE                   *
> > *http://blog.butchevans.com/    *Wired or wireless Networks        *
> > *Mikrotik Certified Consultant *Professional Technical Trainer    *
> > ********************************************************************
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to