On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Paul Seelig <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, this is not at all a different thing in context of what i wrote > earlier. It is the context which i referred to that matters here. > > It definitely is of no real importance whether the configuration > location is called "GNUstep", or "WindowMaker", or "WMakerIsFarOut", but > from a usability point of view it really shouldn't result in such a > diversified configuration directory layout as the following: > > /etc/WindowMaker + $HOME/GNUstep > or > /etc/GNUstep + $HOME/WindowMaker > > In order to maintain some uniformity it should be rather something like > this: > /etc/GNUstep + $HOME/GNUstep > or > /etc/WindowMaker + $HOME/WindowMaker > or even > /etc/wmaker + $HOME/.wmaker > > Let's just try to get it as uniform as possible. If what makes Window > Maker stand out is superior usability, it really shouldn't stop while > being applied to its configuration directory names. > I completely agree about the uniformity. But if a change from $HOME/GNUstep is decided, can we consider making it something like $HOME/.config/wmaker? Moving configuration files in $HOME/.config reduces the clutter in the $HOME directory considerably.
