> Unfortunately, I disagree. If we allowed any topic
> related to the Web (i.e.
> standards, design, app development, database
> engineering, systems
> integration, education, etc.) we would have an
> extremely wide brief and web
> standards would be drowned out by discussions on
> other web topics - which
> defeats the entire purpose of the list.
>
> I think the point that seems to be missed here is
> that the mission of this
> list is to spread the word about web standards and
> to help developers move
> towards web standards. It is not to educate or
> spread info to developers
> about the entire web. There are hundreds of lists
> and forums available now
> days. If this list is too restrictive for you,
> rather than trying to force
> this list to change to suit your needs, it might be
> worth finding a list
> that suits your purpose. A good start for a broad
> topic list would be
> Webdesign-L.
>
> Russ
I agree with you Russ, our focus should be mainly on
web standards. We should try to discuss on topics
related to only web standards. It may keep the ratio
of messages down but on the topic (web standards).
-Meraj
=====
www.naqoosh.com/mr
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.
http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************
