now you make me believer in the pseudocalls approach, implemented by HB9HQX in the latest version of JT65-HF and described there http://sourceforge.net/projects/jt65hfhb9hqxedi/files/jt65-hf_dll%20-%20Source/ where CQ DX, CQ NA replaced and transmitted as E9DX, E9NA, although it is not compatible with the latest WSJT-X releases.
probably some simple encoding of the long sequence of words with +/-(or dot or comma) code like +0....+9, -0....-9 can address most future requirements for the long messages in WSJT-X. Regards, Igor >Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 11:22 -06:00 от Michael Black <[email protected]>: > >One downside is that R73 won't compress so you may not be able to respond to >some call signs properly > >RRR >Mike W9MDB >This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. >www.avast.com > >On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Игорь Ч < [email protected] > wrote: >>>resending the message, there may still be possibility to change standard QSO >>>exchange sequence: >>> >>>Statistics showing different behaviour of users. >>> >>>I see there is restriction for RR73 as it is matching to the grid square. >>> >>>Just wondering: is there any obstacle to use R73 message instead of the RRR >>>one? >>> >>>73 Igor >>> >>>Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 8:24 -06:00 от Michael Black < [email protected] >>>>: >>> >>>That's why education is important....if you look in the help file you'll >>>find the standard exchange. I know most people will never read that...so >>>perhaps we need some pop up the first time you send an RRR which is then >>>suppressed which says "FYI....RRR is the last message needed for the calling >>>side of a JT QSO...no 73 is needed...see help file" >>> >>>I got educated and quit using it. RRR Mike W9MDB >>> >>> >>>>Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 16:51 +03:00 от Игорь Ч < [email protected] >: >>>> >>>>Hi Mike, >>>> >>>>That is exactly what happens: after the RRR message most users consider as >>>>polite way to send the 73 mesage. >>>> >>>>Alternative option could be R73. >>>> >>>>73 Igor >>>> >>>>Re: [wsjt-devel] RR73 message button >>>>From: Michael Black <mdblack98@gm...> - 2015-12-11 13:23:54 >>>>Attachments: Message as HTML >>>>We've gone through this discussion before...I used to think it was a good >>>>idea too. But...RR73 is a grid location...and RRR is the last message for >>>>the CQ side of the QSO...not 73. >>>>So you don't save any time by doing RR73 unless you would otherwise do an >>>>RRR followed by an unnecessary 73. >>>>It's just hard to drop the habit of using 73 like you use on every other >>>>protocol. >>>>RRR :-) >>>>Mike W9MDB >>>> >>>> >>>>>Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 12:15 +03:00 от Игорь Ч < [email protected] >: >>>>> >>>>>Hi Joe and all, >>>>> >>>>>I have checked statistics based on the All.txt file: at least every second >>>>>operator transmit manually generated message RR73 or 'RRR 73' instead of >>>>>the standard RRR message. File with the summary and raw data in MS Excel >>>>>format is located there: https://cloud.mail.ru/public/4KBg/UoqJWw6rK >>>>> >>>>>Summary does not include scenario where some operators use 73 message >>>>>instead of the RRR one. >>>>> >>>>>There are three reasons to modify user interface with this message: >>>>> >>>>>1. It should reduce spectrum usage and interference on the overcrowded HF >>>>>bands >>>>>2. It will make GUI more user friendly one >>>>>3. It will save time, both, in terms of the QSO length and manual message >>>>>generation >>>>> >>>>>Also possibility to activate prompt for QSO logging on the RR73 message >>>>>would benefit users. >>>>> >>>>>May I ask to consider the code change in some future release, please? >>>>> >>>>>73 Igor UA3DJY >>> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>_______________________________________________ >>wsjt-devel mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
