as there are multiple opinions and some limitations I can see only one solution that could satisfy every user: to let user edit message content for the fixed button RRR. This way users would set this automatic message as they like.
73 Igor UA3DJY [wsjt-devel] Expedited JT65A (HF) procedure example, was RR73 message button From: Parker Dinkins <parker@ma...> - 2015-12-11 20:20:53 I don't think one dedicated message button (such as 'RR73') will work for everyone's purpose. >Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 20:47 +03:00 от Игорь Ч <[email protected]>: > >now you make me believer in the pseudocalls approach, implemented by HB9HQX in >the latest version of JT65-HF and described there >http://sourceforge.net/projects/jt65hfhb9hqxedi/files/jt65-hf_dll%20-%20Source/ >where CQ DX, CQ NA replaced and transmitted as E9DX, E9NA, although it is not >compatible with the latest WSJT-X releases. > >probably some simple encoding of the long sequence of words with +/-(or dot or >comma) code like +0....+9, -0....-9 can address most future requirements for >the long messages in WSJT-X. > >Regards, > >Igor > >>Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 11:22 -06:00 от Michael Black < [email protected] >>>: >> >>One downside is that R73 won't compress so you may not be able to respond to >>some call signs properly >> >>RRR >>Mike W9MDB >>This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. >>www.avast.com >> >>On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Игорь Ч < [email protected] > wrote: >>>>resending the message, there may still be possibility to change standard >>>>QSO exchange sequence: >>>> >>>>Statistics showing different behaviour of users. >>>> >>>>I see there is restriction for RR73 as it is matching to the grid square. >>>> >>>>Just wondering: is there any obstacle to use R73 message instead of the RRR >>>>one? >>>> >>>>73 Igor >>>> >>>>Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 8:24 -06:00 от Michael Black < >>>>[email protected] >: >>>> >>>>That's why education is important....if you look in the help file you'll >>>>find the standard exchange. I know most people will never read that...so >>>>perhaps we need some pop up the first time you send an RRR which is then >>>>suppressed which says "FYI....RRR is the last message needed for the >>>>calling side of a JT QSO...no 73 is needed...see help file" >>>> >>>>I got educated and quit using it. RRR Mike W9MDB >>>> >>>> >>>>>Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 16:51 +03:00 от Игорь Ч < [email protected] >: >>>>> >>>>>Hi Mike, >>>>> >>>>>That is exactly what happens: after the RRR message most users consider as >>>>>polite way to send the 73 mesage. >>>>> >>>>>Alternative option could be R73. >>>>> >>>>>73 Igor >>>>> >>>>>Re: [wsjt-devel] RR73 message button >>>>>From: Michael Black <mdblack98@gm...> - 2015-12-11 13:23:54 >>>>>Attachments: Message as HTML >>>>>We've gone through this discussion before...I used to think it was a good >>>>>idea too. But...RR73 is a grid location...and RRR is the last message for >>>>>the CQ side of the QSO...not 73. >>>>>So you don't save any time by doing RR73 unless you would otherwise do an >>>>>RRR followed by an unnecessary 73. >>>>>It's just hard to drop the habit of using 73 like you use on every other >>>>>protocol. >>>>>RRR :-) >>>>>Mike W9MDB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Пятница, 11 декабря 2015, 12:15 +03:00 от Игорь Ч < [email protected] >: >>>>>> >>>>>>Hi Joe and all, >>>>>> >>>>>>I have checked statistics based on the All.txt file: at least every >>>>>>second operator transmit manually generated message RR73 or 'RRR 73' >>>>>>instead of the standard RRR message. File with the summary and raw data >>>>>>in MS Excel format is located there: >>>>>>https://cloud.mail.ru/public/4KBg/UoqJWw6rK >>>>>> >>>>>>Summary does not include scenario where some operators use 73 message >>>>>>instead of the RRR one. >>>>>> >>>>>>There are three reasons to modify user interface with this message: >>>>>> >>>>>>1. It should reduce spectrum usage and interference on the overcrowded HF >>>>>>bands >>>>>>2. It will make GUI more user friendly one >>>>>>3. It will save time, both, in terms of the QSO length and manual message >>>>>>generation >>>>>> >>>>>>Also possibility to activate prompt for QSO logging on the RR73 message >>>>>>would benefit users. >>>>>> >>>>>>May I ask to consider the code change in some future release, please? >>>>>> >>>>>>73 Igor UA3DJY >>>> >>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>wsjt-devel mailing list >>>[email protected] >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >>> >> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
