Agreed on all counts, Gary.
73, N0AN
Hasan
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Gary McDuffie <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar 28, 2018, at 5:48 AM, Hasan al-Basri <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Running DXp by the developers for testing and evaluation is justifiable.
> Releasing DXp "into the wild" with no restraints or protections from abuse
> is irresponsible.
>
> After seeing the results of “turning it loose”, I’m convinced that the
> test versions like rc3 should have a fuse that will make the software (or
> at least the DXp mode) inop after a certain date. This would force an
> upgrade to the current thinking for its use. I doubt this is doable with
> public software, but it would help to limit some of the abuses seen on the
> bands by non-legit DXpeditions.
>
> As an aside, I suspect that many people who are pi$$ed off about what DXp
> mode does to the spectrum will not know enough to be able to separate DXp
> from the basic mode itself, FT8. This would perpetuate the hate that some
> seem to be generating toward it.
>
> Gary - AG0N
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
