No, it's not intuitive. Better is: Single click = lookup; Double click =
call.

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 6:00 PM Tom Melvin <t...@tkrh.co.uk> wrote:

>
> Would it not just be easier to Un-Tick the ‘Double Click on call sets TX
> Enable’  in Settings - you can click to your hearts content, do the DX
> lookup, play with QRZ etc.
>
> Make sure they have finished and when you are happy with split/freq etc.
> just click Enable button
>
> Lot less chance of making errors
>
> Tom
> GM8MJV
>
>
>
>
> On 15 Oct 2018, at 19:55, Carey Fisher <careyfis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, Gary's right. I would like a single click (or ???) to do the lookup
> so I don't have to "quickly jab the Halt Tx button".
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 2:39 PM Gary McDuffie <mcduf...@ag0n.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On Oct 15, 2018, at 11:22, Black Michael via wsjt-devel <
>> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > Maybe we have a different opinion of the path-of-least-resistance here.
>>
>> Personally, I often double click a line just to have the callsign looked
>> up and get the grid, whether I intend to work him or not.  I just have to
>> quickly jab the halt tx button to be sure it doesn’t go out or at least is
>> limited to a second or so transmit, if that.
>>
>> Gary - AG0N
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>>
>
>
> --
> Carey Fisher
> careyfis...@gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>


-- 
Carey Fisher
careyfis...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to