> On Jan 16, 2019, at 05:34, Chris Deacon <cjdeac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As a matter of interest, Bill, why has the software been written not to allow > TX below 200 Hz? I've always wondered.
There’s a setting on the waterfall controls that sets the lower limit. I have mine set at 100 and don’t seem to have any problem decoding a little below that. However, I would recommend not operating down there to help maintain clean signals (be sure to use CAT control). You really should be calling him on a different frequency than he is operating on. Not just because he was so low, but also because that is the preferred procedure. Gary - AG0N _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
