"a pair of equal and oppositely charged or magnetized poles separated by
a distance."
Is the 'equal' referring to the amount of 'charge' applied to both poles
rather than length ? It certainly could be interpreted that way, rather
than assume 'equal' length of the 'poles'.
In that context The OCF dipole seems very credible, and I think it
provides more description to its design than a ocf antenna, which could
be anything physically imagined.
Adrian Fewster
vk4tux
Let me raise the classic "fact" example that I use all the time that is used to diminish
AR and its people - The "Off Centre Fed Dipole". How can an dipole by scientific
definition be fed off centre? Yet this appears time and time and time again in ARRL Manuals etc....
and this one example is OFTEN used at high engineering levels to put Amateur Radio and its
technical competence down.
[ Ps... it is an Off-Centre-Fed Antenna not dipole ]
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
